- special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
it is impossible to gauge midstream for sure without seeing the near bank in frame but the 2nd & closest of the 7 fresh czdepl pix just filed at borderpoint by
Dec 04, 2005 @ 10:13 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
- Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
I added photo 17a in BorderPoint Photos for a closer shot of the imaginary tripoint in the middle of the river. Hopefully, this photo will help determine the
Dec 05, 2005 @ 07:50 - xachary04 ("xachary04" <xachary04@...>)
- Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
I notice that there are differences between my 2005 photos and those taken by the GCEBE in 2001. The Polish side of the tripoint is cleared of trees. The
Dec 05, 2005 @ 08:28 - xachary04 ("xachary04" <xachary04@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
bravo mike & thanx i think what is clear now with benefit of your pic 17a is that when you shot 19a you were either zooming & or more likely practically
Dec 05, 2005 @ 16:21 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
- AW: [BoundaryPoint] Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
Walking through the Neisse is technically possible (not so nice in winter, but certainly in summer), as many migrator-refugees have demonstrated while the
Dec 05, 2005 @ 17:55 - Wolfgang Schaub ("Wolfgang Schaub" <Wolfgang.Schaub@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
Just curious - given the uncertainty about the exact location expressed in your analysis, Mike, how would you determine/measure success when you say i can
Dec 06, 2005 @ 15:01 - Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
Since the CAUS international boundary in the St. Lawrence River is reduced to straight lines and turning points, the New York-Ontario-Québec tripoint should
Dec 06, 2005 @ 15:58 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
wowww & thanxxx hugh for these 2 beautiful questions & concluding delicacy intertwingling ahead ... of course with most any amphibious or class b try which btw
Dec 06, 2005 @ 17:27 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
lowell you may well know better about louisiana & or in general & i hope you do but the difficulty with your florida example & perhaps all of these you mention
Dec 06, 2005 @ 20:35 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
So if you know that you are correct to within one sq. ft and, assuming that your torso covers more than one square foot, you could just lie down on the ground
Dec 06, 2005 @ 21:04 - Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
Thanks - these are most helpful responses _____ From: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of aletheia kallos Sent:
Dec 06, 2005 @ 21:08 - Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@...>)
- Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
Hi Hugh, I don t believe I was the person who stated that I was successful in reaching the tripoint. I think Aletheia mentioned my success. In fact, I did
Dec 06, 2005 @ 22:11 - xachary04 ("xachary04" <xachary04@...>)
- Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
another nice subltety & subtle nicety there but i think what you are most likely describing is just the best imaginable class b visit as in really really
Dec 06, 2005 @ 22:12 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
- Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
Dec 06, 2005 @ 22:15 - xachary04 ("xachary04" <xachary04@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
Thanks Mike - I just realised that you probably don t realise that aletheiak is actually the handle of another Mike so it was to that Mike I that I was
Dec 06, 2005 @ 22:26 - Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@...>)
- Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
yes & in fairness to you mike i really do believe you equalled or surpassed our most successful visit to date here in a category which we have been calling
Dec 06, 2005 @ 22:28 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
- putatively absolute visit to unmarked mountaintop tripoint escapes
... yikes clumsily said in retrospect hahahaha but you probably saw what i meant anyway which is basically just making some pointed gesture of touching the
Dec 07, 2005 @ 00:58 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
Mike D., I understand what you are saying, but I think you and I just interpreted Hugh s second-paragraph question differently. Oh, I don t know that there was
Dec 07, 2005 @ 04:28 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- nyonqc location was Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
agreed & no biggie in any case but a really interesting upshot of all this is the following pair of more detailed & reliable looking maps of nyonqc than i have
Dec 07, 2005 @ 11:43 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] nyonqc location was Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
I would be very sceptical of placing much/any reliance on that map for detailed and highly precise navigation purposes. There is no evidence that it is the
Dec 07, 2005 @ 15:13 - Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@our-own-home.com>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] nyonqc location was Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
agreed that skepticism is always a good idea & i can add from some experience especially so for this nyonqc baby & for indian & third world mapping in general
Dec 07, 2005 @ 17:45 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] nyonqc location was Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
OOPS - forgot the attachment Unfortunately I have been unable to obtain the relevant USGS quad from http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov since o44074h6 is cut off
Dec 07, 2005 @ 18:31 - Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@our-own-home.com>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] nyonqc location was Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
oops but hold everything please this lost ellicott rock is causing some upheavals in my measurements & computations & skepticism of my own results so i have
Dec 07, 2005 @ 18:34 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] nyonqc location was Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
Unfortunately I have been unable to obtain the relevant USGS quad from http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov since o44074h6 is cut off at 45 deg N (see attached)
Dec 07, 2005 @ 18:27 - Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@...>)
- nyonqc location was Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
still running out of the house but at this point i have far more confidence in your official canadian caus & nyonqc depictions than any other both of the usgs
Dec 07, 2005 @ 19:06 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] nyonqc location was Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
OK - found a collared version which extends north a bit - see attached. It is hard to tell exactly what this map is saying since there does appear to be a
Dec 07, 2005 @ 19:14 - Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@our-own-home.com>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] nyonqc location was Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
yikes haha ok but this is the same map i began from in the middle of http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/18922 which has long since been
Dec 08, 2005 @ 00:01 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
- nyonqc location was Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
& at the same time lets carry another hypothesis which is that canada is right naturally enough about nyonqc in principle but that the usa is right about caus
Dec 08, 2005 @ 02:52 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] nyonqc location was Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
I would like to determine, from copies of treaties, legislation or whatever, the exact line of the ONQC border. I had no success in find this online earlier
Dec 08, 2005 @ 06:13 - Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@...>)
- nyonqc location was Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
funny how we landed a minute apart & let me just insert these comments this time as it is getting late ... great me too & a good place to begin was the
Dec 08, 2005 @ 06:56 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
- nyonqc continuation from czdepl
a few more aftertones of course i didnt mean crown waters included all sweet waters but certainly at least these most flagrantly navigable ones & i now surmise
Dec 08, 2005 @ 17:32 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
- Re: nyonqc continuation from czdepl
or yikes it could still just be that some time between 1959 when the seaway was cut & the date of your canadian topo which was what btw cartographic convention
Dec 08, 2005 @ 18:52 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: nyonqc continuation from czdepl
Cdn topo was dated 2000 _____ From: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of aletheiak Sent: Thursday, December 08,
Dec 09, 2005 @ 03:21 - Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@...>)