Thanks Mike - I just realised that you probably don't
realise that aletheiak is actually the handle of another "Mike" so it was to
that Mike I that I was referring when I said "Mike" :)
I wouldlike to visit that tripoint at some
time.
Cheers
Hugh
Hi Hugh,
I don't believe I was the person who stated
that I was successful in
reaching the tripoint. I think Aletheia
mentioned my "success." In
fact, I did state that I did not make it
on the water tripoint nor
did I determine where it was exactly
located.
The only credit that I can take is standing on all three
sections by
going through the regular passport controls. Some of you
have been
to other tripoints and have walked around them. I couldn't
do that
because the tripoint is located in the river. Since I was by
myself,
I didn't want to have to deal with possible border guards looking
at
my non-EU passport if I decided to wade into the water.
I hope
someday one of you will be willing to get your feet wet and
stand (or
swim) at the Zittau tripoint.
Mike B
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Hugh Wallis" <hugh@o...>
wrote:
>
> Just curious - given the uncertainty about the
exact location
expressed in
> your analysis, Mike, how would you
determine/measure "success"
when you say
> "i can only look forward
all the more eagerly to our first
amphibious try
> here because
there is now every reason to make one & expect it
will be
>
successful "
>
> This raises the question of whether you or
anyone else here are
aware of any
> similar wet tripoints being
defined legally in some more precise
(and
> stationary) manner such
as by means of providing Lat/Long
coordinates
> according to some
datum (as distinct from your speculated method
in this
> case
involving fluvial mid lines which necessarily will change
over time)
?.