Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvement
Date: Dec 06, 2005 @ 15:58
Author: Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
----- Original Message -----From: Hugh WallisSent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 9:01 AMSubject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: special congrats may be in order for czdepl improvementJust curious - given the uncertainty about the exact location expressed in your analysis, Mike, how would you determine/measure "success" when you say "i can only look forward all the more eagerly to our first amphibious try here because there is now every reason to make one & expect it will be successful "This raises the question of whether you or anyone else here are aware of any similar wet tripoints being defined legally in some more precise (and stationary) manner such as by means of providing Lat/Long coordinates according to some datum (as distinct from your speculated method in this case involving fluvial mid lines which necessarily will change over time) ?.