1. Murder on a Border
    This may sound a bit pedantic, but I ve been wondering what would happen if a killer placed the corpse on an actual border. Say it was on a straight line
    Feb 10, 2005 @ 18:59 - sdrawkcabdom ("sdrawkcabdom" <sdrawkcab8@...>)
  2. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Murder on a Border
    Does anyone remember the results of the case (old!) where some guy was chasing another guy and the guy in back shot the guy in front. The problem was that the
    Feb 10, 2005 @ 20:28 - Dallen Timothy (Dallen Timothy <dtimothy@...>)
  3. AW: [BoundaryPoint] Murder on a Border
    The Oetzi case perhaps may provide guidance...? The corpse was secured by Austrians, but lies in an Italian museum now, after some legal hassle. Wolfgang ...
    Feb 10, 2005 @ 21:02 - Wolfgang Schaub ("Wolfgang Schaub" <Wolfgang.Schaub@...>)
  4. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Murder on a Border
    Not a murder but: There was a guy in Berlin named John Runnings who regularly lay on the dividing line at Checkpoint Charlie and tried to get the East German
    Feb 10, 2005 @ 21:31 - John J. Kelly ("John J. Kelly" <johnkelly@...>)
  5. Re: AW: [BoundaryPoint] Murder on a Border
    An even better conundrum: What would happen if a murder took place at a tri-point? The killer in country A shoots victim, who is in country B and the body
    Feb 10, 2005 @ 21:34 - Doug Murray (Doug Murray <doug@...>)
  6. inspiration on a Border
    ... hahaha but very nice indeed john & apologizing for it not being a murder too hahahahaha hahahahahaha you droll fellow you daring to change the topic on us
    Feb 10, 2005 @ 21:46 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  7. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Murder on a Border
    Doesn t matter where the murder was committed. Being murdered is not a crime. Firing the weapon is the crime. John ... ===== You only get one chance on this
    Feb 10, 2005 @ 22:10 - Seymour Dupa (Seymour Dupa <grumpy_44134@...>)
  8. RE: Murder on a Border
    Speaking of Murder on a Border... Some of you in the USA may be aware that a little piece of land connected to New Jersey extends out into the Delaware River
    Feb 10, 2005 @ 23:05 - Ron McConnell ("Ron McConnell" <rcmcc@...>)
  9. killcohook & more on a border
    ron ... indeed this was mentioned as recently as this morning in 16638 & there is a similar but smaller & less well known piece of delaware connected to new
    Feb 10, 2005 @ 23:47 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  10. Re: killcohook & more on a border
    interestingly this lesser bit of rive gauche delaware was not the direct result of such an avulsion as killcohook was nor could accretion ever create any left
    Feb 11, 2005 @ 01:14 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  11. Re: killcohook & more on a border
    more on both these dry denj tongues in messages 1525 & 10071 & 10078 ... of ... to ... that ... nuclear ... wet ... jersey
    Feb 11, 2005 @ 01:30 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  12. Re: killcohook & more on a border
    also message 605 toward the end & i know i get a bit carried away here but it is an interesting one too ... result ...
    Feb 11, 2005 @ 01:57 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  13. RE: killcohook & more on a border
    aletheiak says, indeed this was mentioned as recently as this morning in 16638 [and more] Ah! I should pay more attention. I ll check back. Thanks for the
    Feb 11, 2005 @ 16:55 - Ron McConnell ("Ron McConnell" <rcmcc@...>)
  14. Re: killcohook & more on a border
    doc ... ever after i look like homer simpson on one of his brighter days ... makes perfect sense & all together a great fit
    Feb 11, 2005 @ 17:45 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  15. Re: killcohook & less
    ... dohhh i think like him on one of his brighter days too for if the dirt really came from dredging the shipping channel as we both believe is likely then of
    Feb 11, 2005 @ 21:44 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  16. killcohook & still less
    ... of ... to ... that ... & here is some already in item 4 of http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=2 95&invol=694 the 7th numbered
    Feb 11, 2005 @ 22:59 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  17. possible explanation for undermeasurement of 12mile arc
    ... http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=2 ... http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=2 ... extending the new
    Feb 12, 2005 @ 12:42 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  18. Re: [BoundaryPoint] possible explanation for undermeasurement of 12mile arc
    I m trying to find the time to delve into the legal history of this short arc segment in an effort to understand its apparent undermeasurement, but in the
    Feb 12, 2005 @ 18:05 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  19. Re: [BoundaryPoint] possible explanation for undermeasurement of 12mile arc
    ... fantastic & when you can please read or reread first of all that the center point of the undermeasured 1934 arc is stated in the same 1935 supreme court
    Feb 13, 2005 @ 19:26 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  20. Re: [BoundaryPoint] possible explanation for undermeasurement of 12mile arc
    Okay. If the Supremes specified the courthouse spire as the center point, then we re back to square one. I ll be glad to contact Mr. Schenck this week to pose
    Feb 13, 2005 @ 23:43 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  21. Re: [BoundaryPoint] possible explanation for undermeasurement of 12mile arc
    I ve read what the Supremes had to say in 1934 and 1935, and I ve written to Mr. Schenck in Delaware. Lowell G. McManus Leesville, Louisiana, USA
    Feb 14, 2005 @ 04:25 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  22. Re: [BoundaryPoint] possible explanation for undermeasurement of 12mile arc
    ... great for if this sandy schenck of yours is the same person as my earlier contact william s schenck then he was apparently unaware of or at least not
    Feb 14, 2005 @ 14:42 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  23. Re: [BoundaryPoint] possible explanation for undermeasurement of 12mile arc
    Yes, he is William S. Sandy Schenck. Learn about him and see his picture at http://www.udel.edu/dgs/DGS/Staff/wss.html . He s a hard-rock geologist, not a
    Feb 14, 2005 @ 16:46 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  24. Re: [BoundaryPoint] possible explanation for undermeasurement of 12mile arc
    good show so we can hold the missing & also very significant 180th delaware border stone in reserve then too for this info suggests sandy will be better for
    Feb 14, 2005 @ 18:32 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  25. Re: possible explanation for undermeasurement of 12mile arc
    Lowell says, William S. Sandy Schenck ...he s apparently the State of Delaware s go-to guy on its boundaries. I recall someone else in DE being involved,
    Feb 15, 2005 @ 16:13 - Ron McConnell ("Ron McConnell" <rcmcc@...>)
  26. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: possible explanation for undermeasurement of 12mile arc
    ... hahaha & good idea & overall number too for nj guru or the closest thing to it i would nominate our rich castagna whom the supreme court used & who was
    Feb 15, 2005 @ 17:00 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  27. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: possible explanation for undermeasurement of 12mile arc
    Still no word from Mr. Schenck. Whatever the reason is for the under-measurement of this particular arc of the twelve-mile circle, it seems purposeful. We
    Feb 15, 2005 @ 18:26 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  28. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: possible explanation for undermeasurement of 12mile arc
    I have just now received from BP this Wednesday night this message that I posted Tuesday afternoon. Of course, we HAVE heard from Mr. Schenck by now, etc.,
    Feb 17, 2005 @ 05:08 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  29. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: possible explanation for undermeasurement of 12mile arc
    ... good please see below ... yes indeed literally far fetched & it would require a new original blunder in the 1893 demarcation to be compounded by this new
    Feb 17, 2005 @ 17:10 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)