1. CA-US: News story on double stop system
    The latest on CAUS: Thursday » March 27 » 2003 U.S. might add layer at border Two stops each way   Bill Curry National Post Thursday, March 27, 2003
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 16:24 - Doug Murray (Doug Murray <doug@...>)
  2. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    ... Why can t they do everything in one place, or would that be too sensible? Cheers, Kevin Meynell
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 17:02 - Kevin Meynell (Kevin Meynell <kevin@...>)
  3. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    They should copy the Ukranians: 1) at the actual border, a guard will give you (or a group) a handwritten piece of paper showing your number. 2) Passport and
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 17:14 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  4. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    Exactly. Or, as I keep saying, have a unified North American system. Canada and the US do so much trade (each others biggest trading parters) that it would
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 18:12 - Doug Murray (Doug Murray <doug@...>)
  5. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    Did we not also have to check (Czech -- ha ha) out of Slovakia? ...
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 18:13 - Doug Murray (Doug Murray <doug@...>)
  6. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    Don t make me laugh, Doug - the border freaks best friend. J ... From: Doug Murray To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:13 PM
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 18:17 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  7. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    Doug, ... Well I guess it s the typical reaction of politicians who feel they must be seen to be doing something to protect our borders . ... Err, well it
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 18:29 - Kevin Meynell (Kevin Meynell <kevin@...>)
  8. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    On Thursday 27 March 2003 01:29 pm, you wrote: Please get back to dicussing borders or start a separate political discussion group. Thanks. BJB ... -- Brian
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 18:41 - Brian J. Butler (Brian J. Butler <bjbutler@...>)
  9. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    This looks like a border discussion to me, Brian. There are many less border orientated discussion in this group, such like palindromic place names, EU signs,
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 19:50 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  10. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    How does the political pressures behind borders (as much about politics as geography) not fall into discussing borders. I fail to see the connection, or the
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 20:12 - Doug Murray (Doug Murray <doug@...>)
  11. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    Without politics we wouldn t have any borders at all, except geographical borders - and those are rarely discussed here. Jesper ... From: Doug Murray To:
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 20:17 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  12. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    On Thursday 27 March 2003 02:50 pm, you wrote: Ithink we should create separate groups for each of the above mentioned topics. In fact, we should probably
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 21:47 - Brian J. Butler (Brian J. Butler <bjbutler@...>)
  13. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    On Thursday 27 March 2003 03:17 pm, you wrote: No argument, but I don t find the general phenomenon of borders all that interesting. I m interested in the
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 21:56 - Brian J. Butler (Brian J. Butler <bjbutler@...>)
  14. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    On Thursday 27 March 2003 03:12 pm, you wrote: Political pressure might be related to borders, but I thought this group was about boundary points, especiallly
    Mar 27, 2003 @ 21:53 - Brian J. Butler (Brian J. Butler <bjbutler@...>)
  15. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    Brian, ... Well it wasn t my intent to start this debate all over again with some throwaway remarks that were intended to be mildly humorous. This group should
    Mar 28, 2003 @ 00:07 - Kevin Meynell (Kevin Meynell <kevin@...>)
  16. Re: CA-US: News story on double stop system
    thanx to all for your thoughts & comments on this interesting question of what we are about we do have a highly unusual & potentially ambiguous situation here
    Mar 28, 2003 @ 07:09 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  17. Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system
    Mike, ... Which ones? I know about the University of Durham list, but I haven t found any others so far (although maybe I haven t looked hard enough). Should
    Mar 28, 2003 @ 10:09 - Kevin Meynell (Kevin Meynell <kevin@...>)
  18. Re: [BoundaryPoint] New Group?
    Personally, I d hate to see the creation of a new site as it will split all of us. Not only has BP been a great meeting place and source of information -- the
    Mar 28, 2003 @ 13:33 - Doug Murray (Doug Murray <doug@...>)
  19. Re: [BoundaryPoint] New Group?
    I would also rather stay with the group. I also think multipointing alone will not last long. I remember sharing the GEEBE tripoints with you, and it took
    Mar 28, 2003 @ 14:12 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  20. RE: [BoundaryPoint] New Group?
    I am with you Jesper Bill ... From: Jesper Nielsen [mailto:jesniel@image.dk] Sent: 28 March 2003 14:12 To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re:
    Mar 28, 2003 @ 14:58 - Bill Burke ("Bill Burke" <bill@...>)
  21. Re: CA-US: News story on double stop system
    thanx kevin & i am glad you have pinned me to the mat on this question because i really have to add that i am at the same time rather fond of most of our
    Mar 28, 2003 @ 15:37 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  22. Re: CA-US: News story on double stop system
    thanx kevin & i am glad you have pinned me to the mat on this question because i really have to add that i am at the same time rather fond of most of our
    Mar 28, 2003 @ 15:30 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  23. Re: New Group?
    ... i disagree but if you lose interest i agree it wont last so long for you ... months before anybody actually responded. hahaha i was too busy try pointing
    Mar 28, 2003 @ 17:06 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  24. Re: New Group? Hoo, boy!
    The subject matter of borders, whether we discuss three-way or four way meetings, or circles in the sand or sea or whatever, in the context of either geography
    Mar 29, 2003 @ 04:54 - L. A. Nadybal ("L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>)
  25. Re: New Group? Hoo, boy!
    hahahaha well that explains everything len a lamentably deplorably frustrated philatelist & lamentable cocreator of deplorable philatelic ruin you arrive here
    Mar 29, 2003 @ 16:56 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  26. Re: New Group? Hoo, boy!
    ... All of us, together. LN
    Mar 29, 2003 @ 17:56 - L. A. Nadybal ("L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>)
  27. Re: New Group? Hoo, boy!
    then just to be clear i exempt myself from your idea of we since all is well with me
    Mar 29, 2003 @ 18:29 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  28. Re: New Group? Hoo, Mike!
    ... Dude, what is your problem? Or are you not sober most of the time you write here? Keep writing your speeches, nothing we, with you exepmted can do, but
    Mar 29, 2003 @ 19:20 - Karolis B. ("Karolis B." <kbajoraz@...>)
  29. & now don carlos
    ... time you ... other ... whattt & yes of course i am rarely sober but i certainly didnt mean to insult you or anyone however if you wish to take exception to
    Mar 29, 2003 @ 20:03 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)