I would also rather stay with the
group.
I also think multipointing alone will not
last long. I remember sharing the GEEBE tripoints with you, and it took months
before anybody actually responded.
I went on full 1864-1920 DEDK expedition few days
ago, including a few highest points of counties and also visited the
shortest and longest palindromic places in Denmark. Are my photos and
stories unwanted?
Jesper
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 2:33
PM
Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] New
Group?
Personally, I'd hate to see the creation of a new site as
it will split all of us.
Not only has BP been a great meeting place and
source of information -- the
archive is a treasure.
However, if
the non-multipointing talk has turned into a real issue we could:
a)
vote on the nature of the content on BP and conduct ourselves
within
guidelines agreed to by all.
b) follow the moderator's
wishes and post as per the charter.
c) form a new group, independent
of this one, with more of a border &
geopolitical focus.
Or,
we could continue as we had been with what I had thought was
a robust
discussion group with (to me) a lot of information a only a
little bit
of chaff.
I will go with the
group!
Cheers,
Doug
On Friday, March 28, 2003, at 02:09
AM, Kevin Meynell wrote:
Mike,
>but fortunately there are the other lists
& groups devoted to border
>discussion &
research
Which ones? I know about the University of Durham list,
but I haven't found
any others so far (although maybe I haven't looked
hard enough).
Should we consider establishing a group for
geopolitical discussion related
to border, boundary and
multipoint(ing)?
Regards,
Kevin
Meynell
<image.tiff>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service .
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.