Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system<br/>
Date: Mar 27, 2003 @ 18:12<br/>
Author: Doug Murray (Doug Murray &lt;doug@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="9462.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9466.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic9460.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="9464.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9466.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1318903255">Exactly.  Or, as I keep saying, have a unified North American system.<br/>
Canada and the US do so much trade (each others biggest trading parters)<br/>
that it would only make sense.<br/>
<br/>
The grumpy, short sighted &quot;no&quot; crowd seems to see this as a loss of<br/>
sovereignty.  Does the EU make Germany less sovereign?<br/>
<br/>
The NO folks will be might disappointed when the US cracks down on the<br/>
  border, and trade becomes difficult.  And prices go up!!<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 09:02  AM, Kevin Meynell wrote:<br/>
<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; &gt;Under the system, people entering the United States would be stopped <br/>
&gt; first<br/>
&gt; &gt;at the existing border station, and again further down the road at a<br/>
&gt; &gt;checkpoint where their presence in the country would be registered.<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; Why can&#39;t they do everything in one place, or would that be too <br/>
&gt; sensible?<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; Cheers,<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; Kevin Meynell<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&lt;image.tiff&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. </span></blockquote></div>