Subject: Re: CA-US: News story on double stop system<br/>
Date: Mar 28, 2003 @ 15:30<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="9486.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9488.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic9460.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="9486.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9488.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1772862769">thanx kevin<br/>
& i am glad you have pinned me to the mat on this question<br/>
because i really have to add that i am at the same time rather <br/>
fond of most of our offpoint fluff <br/>
& fond of all the fluffers too<br/>
& i imagine everyone else here is too<br/>
& i wish they will continue reporting everything that actually feels <br/>
good to them <br/>
no matter how offpoint<br/>
<br/>
& i also hasten to add i dont even know if the ibru or the ibrg for <br/>
example would in fact have welcomed say this recent or current <br/>
discussion on the double stop system etc<br/>
as i am not getting & havent posted to either of these known lists<br/>
& i dont actually know of any unknown lists either<br/>
tho i believe one could be created today<br/>
<br/>
moreover i can only say in answer to your underlying question<br/>
based on my own prolonged delicious experience here at bp<br/>
if you can zero in with some specificity on what you really desire<br/>
or if we can do that together or especially even all together<br/>
then whatever it is<br/>
if we build it <br/>
we & they will come<br/>
& it will likely be just as fantastic as bp is now<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
the rest is just miscellaneous observations<br/>
<br/>
i for example would like to build a list devoted to everyones land <br/>
even more expressly than bp already is<br/>
<br/>
but the all parties party is as geopolitical as i would care to get<br/>
<br/>
thats just me<br/>
<br/>
multipointing too is an apolitical & purely integrative act<br/>
<br/>
& the geopolitics of the multipoints per se might be too narrow a <br/>
topic to generate a separate lively list<br/>
<br/>
but multipoint geopolitics <br/>
as distinct from all other politics<br/>
& multipoint practically anything else for that matter <br/>
would actually be onpoint <br/>
indispensably necessary in some cases<br/>
& most welcome here i think<br/>
as it has always & often been<br/>
<br/>
--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, Kevin Meynell <br/>
&lt;kevin@m...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Mike,<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt;but fortunately there are the other lists & groups devoted to <br/>
 </span></blockquote>border <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt;discussion & research<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Which ones? I know about the University of Durham list, but I <br/>
 </span></blockquote>haven&#39;t found <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; any others so far (although maybe I haven&#39;t looked hard <br/>
 </span></blockquote>enough).<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; Should we consider establishing a group for geopolitical <br/>
 </span></blockquote>discussion related <br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; to border, boundary and multipoint(ing)?<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Regards,<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Kevin Meynell </span></blockquote></div>