Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] CA-US: News story on double stop system<br/>
Date: Mar 28, 2003 @ 00:07<br/>
Author: Kevin Meynell (Kevin Meynell &lt;kevin@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="9475.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9479.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic9460.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="9475.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9477.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1479271256">Brian,<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;Political pressure might be related to borders, but I thought this group was<br/>
&gt;about boundary points<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Well it wasn&#39;t my intent to start this debate all over again with some <br/>
throwaway remarks that were intended to be mildly humorous. This group <br/>
should indeed about boundary points, but many of us are also interested in <br/>
the things associated with them. I would happily move such things to a <br/>
geopolitical group related to borders and boundary points, but <br/>
unfortunately I haven&#39;t found one yet.<br/>
<br/>
I&#39;ve noticed that many of the discussions start with boundary points, but <br/>
move onto geopolitical issues because people are interested to know the <br/>
history and politics behind them. This group is the most informative I&#39;ve <br/>
found with respect to geographical curiosities, even if it does <br/>
occasionally divert from its charter. This said, it was never my intention <br/>
to distract from the main topic of multipointing.<br/>
<br/>
Regards,<br/>
<br/>
Kevin Meynell</div>