Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] New Group?
Date: Mar 28, 2003 @ 13:33
Author: Doug Murray (Doug Murray <doug@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Personally, I'd hate to see the creation of a new site as it will split
all of us.
Not only has BP been a great meeting place and source of information --
the
archive is a treasure.

However, if the non-multipointing talk has turned into a real issue we
could:

a) vote on the nature of the content on BP and conduct ourselves within
guidelines agreed to by all.

b) follow the moderator's wishes and post as per the charter.

c) form a new group, independent of this one, with more of a border &
geopolitical focus.

Or, we could continue as we had been with what I had thought was
a robust discussion group with (to me) a lot of information a only a
little bit of chaff.

I will go with the group!

Cheers,

Doug

On Friday, March 28, 2003, at 02:09 AM, Kevin Meynell wrote:

> Mike,
>
> >but fortunately there are the other lists & groups devoted to border
> >discussion & research
>
> Which ones? I know about the University of Durham list, but I haven't
> found
> any others so far (although maybe I haven't looked hard enough).
>
> Should we consider establishing a group for geopolitical discussion
> related
> to border, boundary and multipoint(ing)?
>
> Regards,
>
> Kevin Meynell
>
>
<image.tiff>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.