- Maienbühl
Does someone know the history behind the Swiss salient by the name of Maienbühl, N.E. of Basle? It is a very narrow, but quite long piece of land, that pokes
Aug 18, 2001 @ 00:17 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Maienbühl
I know I should have brought it up when the question on Maienbuhl was asked, but isn t it a possibility that the salient is just the normal border somehow. I
Aug 27, 2001 @ 20:29 - Arif Samad (Arif Samad <fHoiberg@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Maienbühl
wonderful to have you back in strength arif & as much as i would like to believe our quintitertiary point of okeechobee is the global maxipoint i believe you
Aug 27, 2001 @ 21:34 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Maienbühl
Mike, If I only knew what kind of point I found, I would be able to tell you. It isn t a tripoint in international level, so I was hesitant at first to
Aug 28, 2001 @ 04:01 - Arif Samad (Arif Samad <fHoiberg@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Maienbühl
Arif, Where in Sweden are Trestickan National Park and Takeholmen? Jan Vilnius, Lithuania http://home.no.net/enklaver
Aug 28, 2001 @ 07:05 - Jan Krogh ("Jan Krogh" <jakro64@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Maienbühl
well it still sounds like you have discovered a true quintipoint & very possibly the most major quinti in the world hence global maxipoint by that reckoning
Aug 28, 2001 @ 19:31 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
- Re: Maienbühl
First, I don t rule out that Maienbühl is something very normal. It just looks peculiar, so why wouldn t there be some sort of a story to it? On quintipoints:
Aug 28, 2001 @ 19:47 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Maienbühl
... this may well be in any case the question remains as you also seem to wonder below can we find or rather confirm a living quintipoint anywhere that is
Aug 29, 2001 @ 20:04 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
- Re: Maienbühl -> quintipoints
... equal or ... at ... I don t think I (or Arif) said Maienbühl was a quintipoint situation. Perhaps we should have changed the subject title of the mails
Aug 29, 2001 @ 20:20 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
- scandinavian quintipoint documentation elusive
arif you reported way back in message 3757 referring to the map in message 1936 ... & i have been trying to confirm these data ever since nor have i even found
Apr 08, 2002 @ 04:29 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- Re: scandinavian quintipoint documentation elusive
acroorca2002 wrote: (...)nor have i even found an online atlas for sweden or norway(...) Statens Kartverk s Norgesglasset (
Apr 08, 2002 @ 17:38 - ps1966nl ("ps1966nl" <smaardijk@...>)
- Re: scandinavian quintipoint documentation elusive
wonderful thanx peter that does give me the greater part of what i was looking for yet it also represents a setback in classifying & naming this point inasmuch
Apr 09, 2002 @ 15:12 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- Re: scandinavian quintipoint documentation elusive
acroorca2002 wrote: (...)the part involving the internal swedish boundary of ... source i still cant find(...) Yes, it s also true! Probably another
Apr 09, 2002 @ 16:37 - ps1966nl ("ps1966nl" <smaardijk@...>)
- Re: scandinavian quintipoint documentation elusive
yep that does it a confirmed & reconfirmed quintipoint tho i too cant tell if the swedish internal boundary is municipal or submunicipal & in addition it
Apr 10, 2002 @ 18:09 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)