Subject: Re: scandinavian quintipoint documentation elusive<br/>
Date: Apr 09, 2002 @ 15:12<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="6155.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6161.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic3666.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="6157.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6159.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-710348053">wonderful<br/>
thanx peter<br/>
that does give me the greater part of what i was looking for<br/>
yet it also represents a setback in classifying & naming this point<br/>
inasmuch as our erstwhile nose3 hopeful is now looking more like a <br/>
hopelessly split level nose4<br/>
<br/>
for only with great good luck may it still pan out as nose4vvwwxxyyzz<br/>
a weird international conjunction of 5 submunicipal entities if they <br/>
all exist<br/>
actually breaking down into nose2osvg3arhauu4vvwwxxyyzz<br/>
with uu thru zz representing unknown or possibly even nonexistent <br/>
municipal or submunicipal entities<br/>
but even this analysis is still mostly wishful thinking<br/>
especially the part involving the internal swedish boundary of <br/>
unknown level reported by arif in message 3757 in the swedish source <br/>
i still cant find<br/>
<br/>
what a mess<br/>
& it will probably remain so without a lot more detailed digging than <br/>
we can even hope to do at this point<br/>
<br/>
now if there were as fine a swedish zoomable map as your norwegian one<br/>
we might at least be able to confirm that we have something quintifold<br/>
or at least a solid tertiary quadripoint with a split section<br/>
<br/>
but a solid quaternary quintipoint would still be way beyond that<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
also on another front <br/>
since we are counting our quintipoints before they hatch as well as <br/>
after<br/>
can anyone say positively that the ghost quinti at bedenl subsuming <br/>
moresnet & eupen malmedy doesnt still survive at the submunicipal <br/>
level<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;ps1966nl&quot; &lt;smaardijk@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; acroorca2002 wrote:<br/>
&gt; &quot;(...)nor have i even found an online atlas for sweden or norway<br/>
(...)&quot;<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Statens Kartverk&#39;s Norgesglasset ( <br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://ngis2.statkart.no/norgesglasset/default.html">http://ngis2.statkart.no/norgesglasset/default.html</a> ) is what <br/>
you&#39;re <br/>
&gt; looking for, Michael.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &quot;(...)at the same time i have found that the municipalities of <br/>
halden <br/>
&gt; & aremark in the norwegian county of ostfold might possibly <br/>
converge <br/>
&gt; upon the island in question<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; yet there doesnt appear to be any other norwegian local boundary  <br/>
&gt; convergent there for all i can see from here (...)&quot;<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; You are right about the municipalities. The other border coming in <br/>
to <br/>
&gt; this island from the Norwegian side is an internal border in the <br/>
&gt; Halden municipality (possibly some sort of municipality section).<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; So four out of five ain&#39;t bad...<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; A fifth may also be appearing still...<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Peter S. </span></blockquote></div>