Subject: Re: scandinavian quintipoint documentation elusive<br/>
Date: Apr 10, 2002 @ 18:09<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="6161.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic3666.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="6166.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6168.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-849279073">yep<br/>
that does it<br/>
a confirmed & reconfirmed quintipoint<br/>
tho i too cant tell if the swedish internal boundary is municipal or <br/>
submunicipal<br/>
& in addition it appears that the norwegian aremark municipality is <br/>
not subdivided anywhere<br/>
oops<br/>
at least according to your norwegian zoomable map that does identify <br/>
the subdivision lines within the haldane municipality<br/>
<br/>
so we are stopped short of making a positive identification here of a <br/>
homogeneous quaternary quintipoint but will have to be content at <br/>
least for the time being & probably forever with a tertiary <br/>
quaternary blend<br/>
<br/>
also content with a defective cockabebble name of nose34arhahamamo<br/>
based on the following mostly unsatisfactory diglyphs<br/>
ar aremark<br/>
haha for the 2 unknown submunicipalities of haldane<br/>
ma marrefjallet<br/>
mo monasen<br/>
these latter 2 having been taken from the swedish zoomable but <br/>
without much confidence in their correctness<br/>
<br/>
but then that still makes nose34arhahamamo a fine companion for <br/>
bedenl34aakenmplva as renamed from your data below<br/>
both being split level as well as world class<br/>
even if these are no match for the homogeneous heirlemaor & glhemaokpa<br/>
<br/>
nice also to realize that we even have 4 quintipoints of any <br/>
description in the world <br/>
to match our 4 world class boundary crosses<br/>
for general balance<br/>
but especially if we should ever want to have a bp square dance<br/>
<br/>
m <br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;ps1966nl&quot; &lt;smaardijk@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; acroorca2002 wrote:<br/>
&gt; &quot;(...)the part involving the internal swedish boundary of <br/>
&gt; &gt; unknown level reported by arif in message 3757 in the swedish <br/>
&gt; source i still cant find(...)&quot;<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Yes, it&#39;s also true! Probably another submunicipal boundary, this <br/>
&gt; time a Swedish one. Look for <br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.lantmateriet.se/index_eng.htm">http://www.lantmateriet.se/index_eng.htm</a> , and choose Map Search.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &quot;(...)also on another front since we are counting our quintipoints <br/>
&gt; before they hatch as well as after can anyone say positively that <br/>
the <br/>
&gt; ghost quinti at bedenl subsuming moresnet & eupen malmedy doesnt <br/>
&gt; still survive at the submunicipal level&quot;<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Not at the municipal level, but the old eastern boundary of Neutral <br/>
&gt; Moresnet is also the old municipal boundary between Kelmis and Neu-<br/>
&gt; Moresnet (now both, with the former municipality Hergenrath, in the <br/>
&gt; municipality of Kelmis/La Calamine). It is still a postal boundary <br/>
&gt; (Kelmis has 4720 as postal code; Neu-Moresnet has 4721). The former <br/>
&gt; municipal boundaries have generally still meaning for the Belgian <br/>
&gt; mail in Belgium (postal code and/or postal town name).<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; So at bedenl, the following entities meet:<br/>
&gt; The Netherlands, Limburg province, Vaals municipality<br/>
&gt; Germany, North Rhineland-Westphalia fed. land, Aachen city<br/>
&gt; Belgium, Liege prov, Plombieres (Bleiberg) mun., Gemmenich former <br/>
mun.<br/>
&gt; Belgium, Liege prov, Kelmis (La Calamine) mun., Kelmis former mun.<br/>
&gt; Belgium, Liege prov, Kelmis (La Calamine) mun., Neu-Moresnet former <br/>
&gt; mun.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Peter S. </span></blockquote></div>