1. dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    so to sum up & then proceed the best available & indeed authoritative positions if not of these 2 tripoints themselves then at least of the low water marks
    Sep 23, 2004 @ 19:49 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  2. Re: [BoundaryPoint] dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    I d love to be there, but I can t get away. I think it s good to carry forward any and all notions of how to extend VAWV to the tripoint. Sometimes, there s
    Sep 23, 2004 @ 22:43 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  3. Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    ... extend VAWV to ... look to make ... courthouse land books of ... thanx & yes i am aware that a copy of the survey presently in my hands has also been
    Sep 24, 2004 @ 06:04 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  4. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    You have the survey in-hand. Good. If the end of the line on the river bank is unmonumented, but merely an extrapolation of two other monumented points, is
    Sep 24, 2004 @ 14:16 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  5. Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    ... merely an ... reason to believe ... not to extend ... yes i think the reasons to believe it are that this point is actually specified as the terminal point
    Sep 24, 2004 @ 23:04 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  6. Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    further developments in the chase or chases an inconvenient but inescapable new fact has emerged the mdvawv latitude given at the corner corner would place the
    Sep 26, 2004 @ 18:38 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  7. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    There is an article on the survey of the VAWV boundary between Loudoun and Jefferson counties in PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR magazine at
    Sep 26, 2004 @ 21:18 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  8. Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    yes kevins my man & tho i agree his excellent report does not directly address the question of the tripoint it certainly provides a new clue that could well
    Sep 26, 2004 @ 23:07 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  9. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    Please see my two insertions below. Lowell G. McManus Leesville, Louisiana, USA ... From: aletheiak To:
    Sep 27, 2004 @ 03:58 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  10. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    ... From: aletheiak To: Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 6:07 PM Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: dcmdvan &
    Sep 27, 2004 @ 03:37 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  11. Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    ... continued ... the ... tripoint ... boundary ... my ... both ... off ... right but we need to know the actual bearing along this segment of the border which
    Sep 27, 2004 @ 04:03 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  12. Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    just got off the phone with kevin again & the vawv legal description is already on its way to cream hill & he too is now actively pondering the question of
    Sep 28, 2004 @ 15:37 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  13. Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    staggering news the vawv legal description which has just arrived by email & is nothing but a metes & bounds description of the survey indicates unquestionably
    Sep 29, 2004 @ 05:08 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  14. Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    an unexpected bonus document entitled vawv boundary survey project report was also enclosed in the same email its introduction indicates the surveyor was
    Sep 29, 2004 @ 06:32 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  15. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    For what it s worth, a metadata document dated February 10, 2000, from the Virginia Office of Mapping and Geographic Information is quoted on the Loudoun
    Sep 29, 2004 @ 16:42 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  16. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    After much searching, I have found many lay references to the mean low-water mark as the Potomac River boundary between Maryland and Virginia, but I have
    Sep 29, 2004 @ 18:44 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  17. Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    worth a good deal as probable source of the mysterious word m e a n in the legal description & for suggesting virginia state government as the metasource &
    Sep 29, 2004 @ 18:53 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  18. Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    yes & i think all these data only further substantiate an exclusively maritime application for the term mean low water mark & thus its utter confusion &
    Sep 29, 2004 @ 21:04 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  19. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    I agree with your judgment that the term mean is irrelevant at MDVAWV. Unless some legal basis emerges for the word mean, the notion likely comes from the
    Sep 29, 2004 @ 23:17 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  20. Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    ... MDVAWV. Unless ... likely comes from the ... The statute is ... those not. Had ... could have been ... commonly but not always or everywhere universally
    Sep 30, 2004 @ 15:27 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  21. Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    & worth a good deal yet again in view of all the subsequent discoveries & revelations at least for laughs & yet maybe for the real tries too because the claim
    Oct 01, 2004 @ 21:53 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  22. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    ... ..but I should say that the Congress consented to the Black-Jenkins Award of 1877 on March 3, 1879. See http://www.virginiaplaces.org/pdf/mdvaappd.pdf .
    Oct 02, 2004 @ 00:15 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  23. Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
    ... congress of ... oops then maybe i was moving too fast too what i meant was all of the 3 convergents to mdvawv all of which this vawv survey & its
    Oct 02, 2004 @ 01:16 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)