Subject: Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries continued
Date: Sep 24, 2004 @ 23:04
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> You have the survey in-hand. Good.merely an
>
> If the end of the line on the river bank is unmonumented, but
> extrapolation of two other monumented points, is there anyreason to believe
> that the segment is officially intended to terminate there andnot to extend
> onward to Maryland, wherever that may happen be?yes
>continued
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "aletheiak" <aletheiak@y...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 1:04 AM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: dcmdvan & mdvawv retries
>McManus"
>
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G.
> > <mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:to
> > > I'd love to be there, but I can't get away.
> > >
> > > I think it's good to carry forward any and all notions of how
> > extend VAWV toon-site
> > > the tripoint. Sometimes, there's nothing like a personal
> > look to makehands
> > > the best solution obvious.
> > >
> > > Are you aware that the 1997 survey is recorded in the
> > courthouse land books of
> > > both Loudoun and Jefferson counties?
> >
> > thanx
> > & yes i am aware that a copy of the survey presently in my
> > has also been deposited in both those placeshave
> > but i find it hard to conceive how further extrapolations could
> > been made & registered there that are not in the surveyedge of
> >
> > as it is
> > the unmarked terminal point of the survey depicted at the
> > the river is already an extrapolation from the last 2monumented
> > pointscourthouses
> >
> > still it might be a good idea to poke around these
> > in the absence of anything bettersurveyor's
> >
> > my mathematical tries at zeroing in on the 4 potential target
> > areas are proving incredibly complicated too
> >
> > time for a breather perhaps
> >
> >
> > It just might say that the last bearing
> > > continues on to the Maryland boundary. If so, your
> > marker at thecontinued
> > > river's edge might not be intended as terminal, just the only
> > practical place to
> > > put it. Of course, you probably covered all of this in your
> > confabs with the
> > > surveyor.
> > >
> > > Lowell G. McManus
> > > Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak@y...>
> > > To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 2:49 PM
> > > Subject: [BoundaryPoint] dcmdvan & mdvawv retries
> > >http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?z=18&n=4311741.00001324
> > >
> > > >
> > > > so
> > > > to sum up & then proceed
> > > >
> > > > the best available & indeed authoritative positions
> > > > if not of these 2 tripoints themselves
> > > > then at least of the low water marks convergent upon
> > > > them
> > > > is as presented by usgs mapping
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > &e=316164.999969563&datum=nad83http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?z=18&n=4355975&e=26557
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > 4&s=50&size=l&datum=nad83&layer=DRG25&
> > > >
> > > > so the geocoords need to be carefully lifted from the
> > > > paper copies of these topos
> > > > & then used as the primary gps targets
> > > > for the monument based alignments to then pan across
> > > > home in on
> > > >
> > > > & we need to hope mike schwartz has a gps receiver
> > > >
> > > > or that someone who does also attends
> > > >
> > > > or can you confirm that right off mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > also
> > > > special to brian
> > > > can you confirm that the superfine coords you give for
> > > > these points at the corner corner
> > > > namely
> > > > dcmdvan
> > > > nlat 38d56m03s2 x wlong 77d07m12s6 nad27
> > > > &
> > > > mdvawv
> > > > nlat 39d19m16s1 x wlong 77d43m09s4 nad27
> > > > are the same ones you pulled from the paper topos
> > > > & that your tenths of seconds are as significant as
> > > > they appear to be
> > > >
> > > > as i recall
> > > > you took special care with all these at the time
> > > >
> > > > & i am inclined to base the tries directly upon them
> > > > since i already believe they are as right as can be
> > > > rather than bothering to check or redo your work
> > > >
> > > > but i would appreciate any confirmation
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > & to continue
> > > >
> > > > the dcmdvan alignment will be straightforward &
> > > > attainable within centimeters if we find the marker
> > > >
> > > > as i still believe we will
> > > >
> > > > & nothing more needs to be said about it til we try it
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > but the mdvawv alignment is still unknown
> > > > & perhaps unknowable
> > > >
> > > > & we also dont know what authority we could possibly
> > > > consult that would be better than ourselves & our own
> > > > best judgments about it
> > > >
> > > > so far we have 4 choices for the bearing of the
> > > > tripointing stitch from the extant vawv terminus
> > > > each of which will produce a different line
> > > > all of them presumably of slightly different lengths
> > > > & each leading to a different putative tripoint
> > > > position
> > > >
> > > > but we should probably carry all of these forward
> > > > & be open to possible others as well
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > the bearing of the extant legal vawv terminal segment
> > > > is ne36d40m22s
> > > > & i believe it continues to be the leading candidate
> > > >
> > > > the bearing of a line running perpendicular to the
> > > > bank appears to be roughly ne10 degrees
> > > >
> > > > the bearing of a line running perpendicular to the
> > > > river center line appears to be roughly due north
> > > >
> > > > the bearing of a line running directly toward the
> > > > visible ridge continuation above the maryland bank
> > > > appears to be roughly nw10 degrees
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > & there are still a few more numbers i should be able
> > > > to crunch
> > > > so as to tie the topo based coords in with the survey
> > > > based coords
> > > >
> > > > & that should be revealing but will take a while
> > > >
> > > > so please stand by
> > > > &or chime in with anything else
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > of course all four stitch candidates will ultimately
> > > > head off into the white water in different directions
> > > >
> > > > but we could follow them at least to the edge of the
> > > > water & then project them mentally from there
> > > >
> > > > for the time being at least
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > both tries are still looking real for columbus week
> > > > give or take a few days
> > > >
> > > > any further additions corrections comments help
> > > > attendance etc etc would of course be appreciated
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
> > > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >