1. chfrit
    http://www.runaway.de/bilderkaunertal.htm
    Feb 22, 2004 @ 14:38 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  2. Re: [BoundaryPoint] chfrit
    Should br atchit ... From: Jesper Nielsen To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com Cc: Peter Hering Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 3:38 PM Subject: [BoundaryPoint]
    Feb 22, 2004 @ 16:32 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  3. Re: chfrit
    this is apparently the piz lad summit & the cross again but we still dont see the tripoint itself & havent seen a pic of the marker since wolfgang first
    Feb 22, 2004 @ 23:13 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  4. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: chfrit
    Well, in just 6 months we will be there. Jesper ... but we still dont see the tripoint itself & havent seen a pic of the marker since wolfgang first flashed it
    Feb 23, 2004 @ 07:18 - jesniel@image.dk (jesniel@...)
  5. Re: chfrit
    yes that is absolutely glorious & of course the we is all of us here at bp at least vicariously thanx to pete but i gather you must also mean we in the flesh
    Feb 23, 2004 @ 14:09 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  6. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: chfrit
    Yes, me too. Rolf and Doug haven t signed up yet. Jesper ... From: m06079 To: Sent: Monday,
    Feb 23, 2004 @ 19:16 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  7. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: chfrit
    It could be one of the two peaks, each with its one cross, at 2808 m. ... __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 00:58 - Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@...>)
  8. Re: chfrit
    not sure where you are getting this idea from petes map at the end of the photos section shows a single peak at 2808m tho i suppose there could be a twin just
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 02:02 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  9. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: chfrit
    No no no. Look again. From the TP going south along CH-IT, you will see a cross and 2808 mark. There is a small triangle just below the cross, just in IT.
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 04:26 - Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@...>)
  10. atchit wasnt chfrit
    ... ahh ok now i see it hiding in the pink snow rather than off frame very nice twin peaks indeed & yes possibly real twin crosses on them too but the one or
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 05:22 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  11. Re: [BoundaryPoint] atchit wasnt chfrit
    Just pointing out that it could be one of two summits with crosses. Wait but haven t we seen a pic of the tripoint? I remember seeing it, and I think fairly
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 05:33 - Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@...>)
  12. Re: atchit wasnt chfrit
    ... what could be 1 of 2 summits with crosses you must mean you were pointing out that the cross in the pic could be standing on either summit well ok yes for
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 06:16 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  13. Re: atchit wasnt chfrit
    ... http://www.regina-thiele.de/nauders.htm (halfway down, where it says der Grenzstein im Dreiländereck); or even better:
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 10:46 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  14. Re: atchit wasnt chfrit
    ... wrote: thanx & glad i asked as these are better than the ones that were lost possibly even our first human visit here in class a but
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 16:09 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  15. Re: atchit wasnt chfrit
    ... attained ... Not without climbing the cross, and even then it s going to be an awkward thing to do. http://www.alpine-wandergruppe.de/naaf22.jpg is the
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 16:51 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  16. Re: atchit wasnt chfrit
    ... ... Also: http://www.qsl.net/ok1mcs/2003/obr_hb0/TN_P8020114.JPG http://www.qsl.net/ok1mcs/2003/obr_hb0/Naafkopf2570.jpg and
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 17:05 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  17. Re: atchit wasnt chfrit
    ... reached in ... an ... summit, and I ... three ... ahh many thanxxx for all this excellent news for you have fairly demonstrated that only the topmost
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 19:01 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  18. correction atchlis was atchit wasnt chfrit but no new text

    Feb 26, 2004 @ 19:10 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  19. Re: atchit wasnt chfrit
    I agree the cross maybe atchlis, but i have a reasonable doubt. See the links below: http://my.rpbrady.com/latest/collection17/p14.htm
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 19:19 - marcelmiquel@correu.vilaweb.com (<marcelmiquel@...>)
  20. Re: atchit wasnt chfrit
    The cairn looks like to be right next to the cross: http://www.qsl.net/ok1mcs/2003/obr_hb0/TN_P8020093.JPG Peter S.
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 19:27 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  21. Re: atchit wasnt chfrit -> Lost cairn?
    ... Congo (Brazzaville) - Congo (Kinshasa) - Sudan? I don t think there is such a tripoint... What cairn do you mean then, and why is/was it lost? Peter S.
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 20:17 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  22. Re: atchit wasnt chfrit -> Lost cairn?
    good catch & i am glad you asked as it is evidently lost in more ways than i thought hahaha but cdcfsd is what i shouldve said as in kinshasa caf sudan i
    Feb 26, 2004 @ 21:37 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  23. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: atchit wasnt chfrit -> Lost cairn?
    Is this the original photo of AT-CH-IT that was lost? And it looks as if the AT-IT border take a slight turn to the left before hitting the tp. If the tp is
    Mar 02, 2004 @ 22:23 - Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@yahoo.com>)
  24. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: atchit wasnt chfrit -> Lost cairn?
    I think I can explain the apparent 1-cm offset in the ATIT line on the top of the stone. It is a spurious effect of lighting. The lines are carved as deep
    Mar 03, 2004 @ 00:57 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  25. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: atchit wasnt chfrit -> Lost cairn?
    Yes indeed. I didn t notice this at all before, but now that you point it out I can see there is defitinely no dogleg at all: the lines are straight. Looking
    Mar 05, 2004 @ 04:46 - Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@yahoo.com>)
  26. Re: atchit wasnt chfrit -> Lost cairn?
    congrats on both of you for bringing us to this new level the millimetric level of punctological refinement the question of what happens to a tripoint when its
    Mar 05, 2004 @ 16:59 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)