Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: atchit wasnt chfrit -> Lost cairn?
Date: Mar 05, 2004 @ 04:46
Author: Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@yahoo.com>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> I think I can explain the apparent 1-cm offset in--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> the ATIT line on the top of
> the stone. It is a spurious effect of lighting.
>
> The lines are carved as deep V-shaped channels in
> the stone, and the lighting is
> from the upper right. Thus the Swiss and Austrian
> sides of both V's are in
> shadow, while the Italian side of each is lit and
> appears white. All you are
> seeing here in this black-and-white photo are the
> shadowed halves of each line,
> while the actual boundaries lie in the bottom of
> each V. The same offset effect
> can be observed in the left serif of the letter "I"
> for Italy.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Kaufman" <mikekaufman79@yahoo.com>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 4:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: atchit wasnt chfrit
> -> Lost cairn?
>
>
> > Is this the original photo of AT-CH-IT that was
> lost?
> > And it looks as if the AT-IT border take a slight
> turn
> > to the left before hitting the tp. If the tp is
> the
> > dot, then it is 1 cm or so to the left of where
> the
> > straight line AT-IT would hit CH. But it is a
> black
> > and white image and hard to tell, though it does
> seem
> > older (and thus less weathered) than the newer
> color
> > photos we have seen.
> > Mike
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>
>
>