1. bggrtr remonumented
    http://www.sofiaecho.com/article/new-pyramid/id_11871/catid_5 can anyone find a pic of this new marker __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC
    Oct 03, 2005 @ 02:27 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  2. SV: [BoundaryPoint] bggrtr remonumented
    My guess is CSHURO style. The IBRG team was asked for advice on the matter on site in May. Jesper _____ Fra: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
    Oct 03, 2005 @ 05:01 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  3. Re: SV: [BoundaryPoint] bggrtr remonumented
    well ok but cshuro is marked by a ziggurat topped by an obeliskoid whereas the new bggrtr monument thanx to the partial pic youve found is still looking almost
    Oct 03, 2005 @ 12:04 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  4. Re: SV: [BoundaryPoint] bggrtr remonumented
    I have various TR treaty maps of the tp that I can scan. ... well ok but cshuro is marked by a ziggurat topped by an obeliskoid whereas the new bggrtr
    Oct 03, 2005 @ 13:01 - jesniel@image.dk (jesniel@...)
  5. Re: SV: [BoundaryPoint] bggrtr remonumented
    yes please would love to eat em ... groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint ...   ... BoundaryPoint BoundaryPoint ...
    Oct 03, 2005 @ 14:14 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  6. SV: SV: [BoundaryPoint] bggrtr remonumented
    http://www.geocities.com/jesniel/ Maps are not dated, which could have been nice. Last photo show a 320 which we passed on the causeway to Kavak. Jesper _____
    Oct 03, 2005 @ 21:28 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  7. Re: SV: SV: [BoundaryPoint] bggrtr remonumented
    delicious many thanxxx & they give me a bright new idea for regardless of the various map dates they do all together reiterate & underscore the already well
    Oct 03, 2005 @ 22:57 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  8. SV: SV: SV: [BoundaryPoint] bggrtr remonumented
    Yeah, some things are odd. Pro: Our monument is definitively a tripoint monument since it has the three flags, but could still be symbolic The three flags are
    Oct 04, 2005 @ 19:55 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  9. Re: SV: SV: SV: [BoundaryPoint] bggrtr remonumented
    thanx nice please see inserts ... right & i agree it is still unclear if the true tripoint is on the new 3flag marker just as it was unclear if the true
    Oct 05, 2005 @ 00:13 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  10. Re: SV: SV: SV: [BoundaryPoint] bggrtr remonumented
    ... 14th item here http://www.livre-rare-book.com/Matieres/dd/1616n.html not that i would pay the 45 euros but it means theres hope of finding one in a library
    Oct 05, 2005 @ 19:29 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  11. SV: SV: SV: SV: [BoundaryPoint] bggrtr remonumented
    The Greek side mau be the key to the issue. I have in wain been looking for greek news on the tp, including greek name of Kavak. Here is cut and paste for the
    Oct 05, 2005 @ 22:04 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  12. these could be the most telling & interesting 2 points
    ... yes the vista & all the maps are extremely persuasive but did you perhaps follow this vista to its western or upstream end for if true bggrtr is truly on
    Oct 07, 2005 @ 14:37 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  13. SV: [BoundaryPoint] these could be the most telling & interesting 2 points
    If the IBS paper did not confuse us from the start, we would all have been convinced BGGRTR was the marker we saw on the island. But after seeing the TR maps
    Oct 07, 2005 @ 17:07 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  14. bggrtr
    Just added more maps/photos to http://www.geocities.com/jesniel/ Google maps shows Kavak much larger (yes the very big island right in the center). It’s very
    Oct 07, 2005 @ 17:39 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  15. Re: SV: [BoundaryPoint] these could be the most telling & interesting 2 points
    ... i understand that is very telling ... i perfectly understand all that is very persuasive too ... hmm not necessarily nor do i think it is necessary to be
    Oct 07, 2005 @ 18:30 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  16. Re: bggrtr
    ... it is also very likely that everything keeps shifting around here & no more reason to believe your eyes about a satpic whether dated or undated which btw
    Oct 07, 2005 @ 19:17 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  17. was bggrtr remonumented & now washed away again too
    & the new tripoint marker if not the entire flood prone tripoint marker island if they really are tripartite & if they survived the previous flood are now
    Mar 14, 2006 @ 17:58 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  18. bggrtr
    many of the best maps & even a satpic http://www.geocities.com/jesniel/ & much other received wisdom besides all seem to conspire to place the tripoint in the
    Oct 03, 2006 @ 18:30 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@yahoo.com>)