1. Indian mess - French to blame?
    India is not known for its simple boundary solutions, but the boundaries of Pondicherry are a bit of a mess, acc. to
    Apr 25, 2001 @ 14:58 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  2. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Indian mess - French to blame?
    a fine mess peter & a nice map of it under the general category of background info i have come to the conclusion that in reality no one is to blame for this
    Apr 25, 2001 @ 16:19 - michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
  3. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Indian mess - French to blame?
    While India demanded the return of foreign enclaves to the motherland in 1950s and 60s, those of Pakistan in India have sat awaiting India s ratification
    Apr 26, 2001 @ 00:18 - Brendan Whyte ("Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>)
  4. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Indian mess - French to blame?
    Since I started the virtual enclave debate, I feel I should say something. I never actually included the Vatican enclaves as true virtual enclaves, as I am
    Apr 26, 2001 @ 03:18 - Arif Samad (Arif Samad <fHoiberg@...>)
  5. Re: Indian mess - French to blame?
    Thank you Brendan for that lengthy and informative reply on Indian affairs great and small. If the Indians are lucky and willing to accept something from an
    Apr 26, 2001 @ 08:29 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  6. international islands
    arif recently asked ... only an idea but no proof in allocations involving bodies of water & the islands within them the principle of equitability seems to
    Apr 26, 2001 @ 13:54 - michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
  7. Re: Indian mess - French to blame?
    ... The Lateran Treaty certainly makes a clear distinction between the Vatican and these other properties: it uses words like sovereignty , dominion and
    Apr 26, 2001 @ 18:50 - granthutchison@cs.com (granthutchison@...)
  8. Vatican Radio - again
    The list of extraterritorial areas was apparently changed at least once, in 1951 (the radio transmitters were added to the list), acc. to
    Apr 26, 2001 @ 20:13 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  9. Re: Vatican Radio - again
    ... Still, it s pretty odd - it is, for instance, very easy to find out a list of British Overseas Territories or US dependencies, and the status of these
    Apr 26, 2001 @ 21:15 - granthutchison@cs.com (granthutchison@...)
  10. vatican sovereignty
    grant you were saying here to arif that sovereignty doesnt really achieve its full meaning when applied to the vatican & i understand what you meant too but i
    Apr 27, 2001 @ 00:51 - michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
  11. Re: vatican sovereignty
    ... the ... Hmm. So I guess if *god* doesn t want me to have a list of extraterritorial possessions of the Vatican I m in deep trouble. Grant
    Apr 27, 2001 @ 16:52 - granthutchison@cs.com (granthutchison@...)
  12. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: vatican sovereignty
    ... haha i wouldnt imagine so m
    Apr 27, 2001 @ 17:57 - michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
  13. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Indian mess - French to blame?
    The lovely full colour map of calcutta in the rear of the 1991 census handbook (series 26, part xiiA and xiiB, Calcutta Metropolitan District, Town directory
    Apr 26, 2001 @ 10:36 - Brendan Whyte ("Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>)
  14. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Indian mess - French to blame?
    Brendan, Thank you for the research. I guess Goretty disappeared as an enclave at some time. I have not been able to find the 1991 census handbook, so you
    Apr 27, 2001 @ 21:49 - Arif Samad (Arif Samad <fHoiberg@...>)
  15. Re: Indian mess - French to blame?
    It looks like there are three types of boundary divided islands at stake here: 1. (the bigger islands) There were settlements at different points, from where
    Apr 27, 2001 @ 23:28 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  16. hyper boundaries
    wait peter notwithstanding descheemaeker & the basques on this hyper boundary didnt you conclude in message 1740 that the ile de la conference dry condo
    Apr 28, 2001 @ 02:17 - michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
  17. boundary islets
    arif is right here ... some of my best explanations are mistakes m
    Apr 28, 2001 @ 02:16 - michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
  18. Re: hyper boundaries
    ... dry condo ... Yes, I still think this is the situation. ... kind of ... It was meant to mean exactly that. And nothing more should be read into it. It was
    Apr 28, 2001 @ 10:51 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  19. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: hyper boundaries
    good i like the symbolism too & am guessing it was this specific misstep by descheemaeker onto the ile de la conference condo & out of line with his own
    Apr 28, 2001 @ 14:12 - michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)