1. new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    for help in resolving many of the tackiest problems encountered when trying to determine tripoint & extremity geopositions that cannot be finally resolved from
    Jan 17, 2002 @ 23:34 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  2. Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    Except, of course, for the unratified means of erosiion and accretion. I still like the hypothesis that MNNDSD moved gradually from the point 9 chains east of
    Jan 20, 2002 @ 15:31 - bjbutlerus ("bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@...>)
  3. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    brian i know you have offered this opinion before nor did i disagree out loud a second time by offering these new sources because you already heard me once so
    Jan 20, 2002 @ 20:15 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  4. Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    Sorry if I made you feel insecure. The facts from BUS&SS that you mention are the very ones I am using in my hypothesis. We have a difference of opinion as to
    Jan 21, 2002 @ 15:25 - bjbutlerus ("bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@...>)
  5. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    ... & silly of me not to understand why you think in these terms for i would rather be silly than sorry insecure etc & it is of course ones own thought that
    Jan 21, 2002 @ 15:58 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  6. Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    Truce. I will try to get the proof. BJB ... sources ... accretion ... infinite ... mnndsd ... by the
    Jan 21, 2002 @ 16:03 - bjbutlerus ("bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@...>)
  7. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    truth good luck m ... _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
    Jan 21, 2002 @ 16:12 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  8. Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    thanxx to your several recent theories & other new info i have substantially revised my own mnndsd guess in fact much of my 1858 to 2002 chronology guess is
    Jan 23, 2002 @ 16:26 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  9. Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    I have sent a fairly detailed request to the US Army Corps of Engineers in the MN-ND-SD district in an attempt to locate some engineering plans for the Bois de
    Jan 23, 2002 @ 17:30 - bjbutlerus ("bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@...>)
  10. Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    I have sent a fairly detailed request to the US Army Corps of Engineers in the MN-ND-SD district in an attempt to locate some engineering plans for the Bois de
    Jan 23, 2002 @ 17:30 - bjbutlerus ("bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@...>)
  11. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    key largo fl thanx brian & more below ... great this is world class punctology which btw is what i think bp is about at its best If available this map might
    Jan 23, 2002 @ 22:06 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  12. Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    Regarding meanders, avulsions, etc. evidently I am not describing something clearly enough. It is actually the core of my argument so if it is not clear why
    Jan 24, 2002 @ 02:41 - bjbutlerus ("bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@...>)
  13. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    ... ok i am following you so far but please let me butt in here because i was still operating from your earlier hypothesis which began i thought correctly with
    Jan 24, 2002 @ 17:08 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  14. Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    I had did not make a distinction between the DAMN line and the MNND/MNSD line because they are equivalent, following the Bois de Sioux s meanders. The first
    Jan 24, 2002 @ 17:49 - bjbutlerus ("bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@...>)
  15. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    ok but why do you think usace or anyone for that matter would even know which avulsion was the first avulsion since damn m ...
    Jan 24, 2002 @ 18:24 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  16. Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    Well, I am assuming the man-made avulsion required to rechannel the river was the only avulsion in the relevant time-frame. Either a natural or man-made
    Jan 25, 2002 @ 02:34 - bjbutlerus ("bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@...>)
  17. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    additional comments intertwingled below ... that is wonderful i do not poopoo all the new data will be delicious but in the absence of the full chronology of
    Jan 25, 2002 @ 16:23 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  18. Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    Thanks for the twingling. The only comment I have is about MANHVT. It does seem that the tristate marker would pin the location, but what does the boundary
    Jan 25, 2002 @ 20:00 - bjbutlerus ("bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@...>)
  19. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new online legal supplement to bus&ss discovered
    key largo again good point brian it was nagging me too so i also considered the linearity you mention tho i called my version of this absurdity a triline
    Jan 26, 2002 @ 15:48 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)