Except, of course, for the unratified means of erosiion and
accretion. I still like the hypothesis that MNNDSD moved gradually
from the point 9 chains east of the nearby witness monument to the
position shown on the topo map (or thereabouts) and was then frozen
at that position by the man-made avulsion of straightening and
leveeing the river. A possible discrepancy would occur if the topo
map was not made at the time the river was rechanneled (a likely
discrepancy). We really need to see the maps that were used during
the construction project. Also, this hypothesis leads to an infinite
number of paleoMNNDSD points along the 9-chain line segment east of
the witness monument.

BJB

> if you are searching for a particular topic such as mnndsd for

example then

> you can simply scan the list & see that the court at least has

never ruled

> on any of the 3 interstate boundaries that terminate there at

mnndsd

> & thus can conclude that if any change has occurred in the mnndsd

position

> since its creation it would have had to have been approved by the

only other

> possible means of ratification