1. Info re BCIDWA and BCIDMT tripoints
    ... - has anyone visited BCIDWA or BCIDMT, and if so, is the visit info online? - if there have been no visits, is there info online that documents the
    Jul 06, 2004 @ 18:06 - Dave Patton [DCP] ("Dave Patton [DCP]" <dpatton@...>)
  2. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Info re BCIDWA and BCIDMT tripoints
    We often classify tries like this (5 degrees of success): In the files section: BP.Classes.txt ... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/6843 ...
    Jul 06, 2004 @ 23:10 - Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@...>)
  3. Re: Info re BCIDWA and BCIDMT tripoints
    both of these tripoints are still believed to be virgins & as topozone indicates neither is believed to be marked except perhaps as speculated by brian in
    Jul 07, 2004 @ 05:58 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  4. Re: Info re BCIDWA and BCIDMT tripoints
    aha re bcidwa on closer eamination bus&ss reveals the original 1873 survey team which set the 177 idwa markers was forced to stop work a mile short of the
    Jul 08, 2004 @ 17:30 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  5. Re: Info re BCIDWA and BCIDMT tripoints
    & 2 more ahas but re bcidmt this time for again on closer examination of bus&ss all 92 markers of the original 1898 survey of northernmost idmt also prove to
    Jul 09, 2004 @ 19:48 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  6. Re: Info re BCIDWA and BCIDMT tripoints
    ... Here is some info, direct from someone I know at the USGS: ========================================================== Both items are out-of-print. You
    Jul 17, 2004 @ 22:29 - Dave Patton [DCP] ("Dave Patton [DCP]" <dpatton@...>)
  7. Re: Info re BCIDWA and BCIDMT tripoints
    major congrats dave especially as bcidwa was looking far more challenging than bcidmt in terms of remoteness & physical difficulty not to mention in terms of
    Jul 18, 2004 @ 17:38 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  8. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Info re BCIDWA and BCIDMT tripoints
    ... This group s visit class categories are so fuzzy that I don t think I can say with any certainty. However, I think you ll see when I write up my visit
    Jul 20, 2004 @ 01:12 - Dave Patton [DCP] ("Dave Patton [DCP]" <dpatton@...>)
  9. Re: Info re BCIDWA and BCIDMT tripoints
    ... bcidmt ... if you think they are fuzzy at all then maybe you just havent fully understood them yet they are actually quite simple rigorous distinct &
    Jul 20, 2004 @ 05:20 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  10. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Info re BCIDWA and BCIDMT tripoints
    but if the tripoint hadnt been marked by any monument as is the case with few dry but most wet points for example Which wet tps ARE directly marked with a
    Jul 22, 2004 @ 05:22 - Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@...>)
  11. Re: Info re BCIDWA and BCIDMT tripoints
    technically the markers of marked wetpoints would have to be submerged as njnypa occasionally is for example or submerged as well as buried as manhvt usually
    Jul 22, 2004 @ 06:02 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)