- cnkpru 1:200.000
http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/EART/korea/200k/11-52-17.jpg
Nov 22, 2003 @ 22:42 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
... & dig that crazy china proruption with the double chicken neck now visible in all its glory but isnt there some sort of a condo or dispute or some other
Nov 23, 2003 @ 21:30 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
... A possible CNKP river condominium. ... I don t know, but in 1998, KPRU was demarcated except for a small part (less than 100 m) between the first KPRU
Nov 24, 2003 @ 12:31 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
From http://law.optima.ru/View.html?0=42267&1=1 (translated by me): GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION DECREE August, 6, 1998, no. 891 Moscow On the reaching
Nov 24, 2003 @ 14:50 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
thanx much am on a pay computer in san luis obispo now & will savor this more at leisure ... the Russian ... and the ... the ... of ... Affairs of ... Defense
Nov 24, 2003 @ 23:30 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
Another map, dealing with the battle at lake Chasan between the Japanese and the Soviet armies in 1938: http://rkka.ru/maps/hasan.jpg And a picture of Soviet
Nov 25, 2003 @ 15:31 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
& thanx again peter now that i have really studied & appreciated this seamless text but as you indicated there still seems to be some question first they talk
Nov 25, 2003 @ 23:23 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
... this ... ends ... The treaty deals with the tripoint, not with the condominium, and although I can see that you can t really deal with the tripoint
Nov 26, 2003 @ 12:27 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
... ... be ... the ... KPRU. ... boundary). ... like ... more ... a ... In http://www.pnp.ru/pg_nomers/20865.htm (Parlamentskaja gazeta),
Nov 26, 2003 @ 13:38 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
indio ca renewed thanx & bravos peter for this stunningly punctilious analysis so i guess we can say there is a probable or a putative cnkp condo & i think you
Nov 26, 2003 @ 18:53 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
See message 10976 for a refresher on an ARUY anomaly, which is an enclave, but not a condominium. Lowell G. McManus Leesville, Louisiana, USA ... From:
Nov 26, 2003 @ 19:55 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
parker az ok thanx this rules that one out not even sure if there is another situation yet tho there have been various & confusing reports silly but thats all
Nov 27, 2003 @ 01:27 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
Mike - I think you must be recalling the suggested BR-UY condo shown here in the bottom image: http://www.info.lncc.br/wrmkkk/uilhabe.html Isla Brasilera is
Dec 03, 2003 @ 05:58 - Michael Kaufman ("Michael Kaufman" <mikekaufman79@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
i think thats a disputed ownership there tho mike rather than any kind of joint ownership & i may have just been imagining this last one too so really to have
Dec 03, 2003 @ 07:06 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
Yes - that s why I said the suggested BR-UY condo. Part 7 of this study is pretty much the author s view on what should/could be done to resolve the
Dec 04, 2003 @ 06:58 - Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
Rereading my post, the translation might lead to a little confusion here. To clear it up: I think the author suggests two things: 1. the waters can adapt to
Dec 04, 2003 @ 07:25 - Michael Kaufman ("Michael Kaufman" <mikekaufman79@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
yes beautiful thanx again understood & i can read most romance with a dictionary & instinct both of which together tell me about alveo that it is basically
Dec 04, 2003 @ 19:08 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
well since i promised to answer even myself & there are also still these outstanding questions from both my alter eguy & my doppleganger & i love these long
Dec 05, 2003 @ 17:11 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)