Subject: Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
Date: Nov 27, 2003 @ 01:27
Author: m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


parker az

ok thanx
this rules that one out

not even sure if there is another situation yet tho

there have been various & confusing reports

silly but thats all i can remember now

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus"
<mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> See message 10976 for a refresher on an ARUY anomaly, which is an
enclave, but
> not a condominium.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "acroorca2002" <orc@o...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:53 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: cnkpru 1:200.000
>
>
> > indio ca
> >
> > renewed thanx & bravos peter for this stunningly punctilious
analysis
> >
> > so i guess we can say there is a probable or a putative cnkp condo
> >
> > & i think you have nailed its topology as well as possible for now
> >
> > & overnight i may also have recalled a possible 6th or 8th member
of
> > this elite little list of international condos as begun below
> >
> > or perhaps there is a whole new constellation of them in this new
case
> > i forget
> > was it a riverine archipelago or something on aruy or arpa or arbr
> > dang
> > i can never keep them straight anyway
> >
> > but can anyone remind me if this is real
> > or what is what in this last case too
> > just to complete the probable global condo list
> > since or rather if we really can now
> >
> >...