1. Mexican internal maritime allocation
    ... Although I consider myself a Mexiphile and researcher on most things Mexican, I ve never know the republic s internal maritime allocation regime. Mike,
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 02:43 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  2. Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    as i recall mexico is basically just like canada in reserving its entire maritime territory to the federal government except that canadian federal waters end &
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 03:00 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  3. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    ... From: m06079 To: Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:00 PM Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re:
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 03:12 - John Seeliger ("John Seeliger" <jseelige@...>)
  4. Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    ... right this is the ironic boca chica or little mouth of the rio grand where i once walked across almost without getting wet lately it has been mostly bone
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 03:30 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  5. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    That is bizarre! Are you sure that the Mexican states don t even include the beaches, or is it just a matter of federal government ownership of the beaches
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 03:31 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  6. Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    yes i finally am sure now thanx to you http://www.mexicolaw.com/LawInfo30.htm
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 13:33 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  7. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    So, are you saying that this URL makes you sure that the Zona Federal Maritimo Terrestre (ZoFeMaT) is beyond the jurisdiction of the states? It says to me
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 14:33 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  8. Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    the writer of this spanish text deplores that it is actual federal jurisdiction rather than merely federal ownership
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 16:48 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  9. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    Thanks for the useful URL. The writer of the editorial makes the point that there is no constitutional basis for the ZoFeMaT--it being based only on a federal
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 18:35 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  10. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    At www.funcionpublica.gob.mx/unaopspf/dgapi/lgbn_c4.htm is the text of Article 49 of Mexico s General Law of National Goods, in which is delimited the ZoFeMaT.
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 20:00 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  11. Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    ... ticle 49 of Mexico s General Law of National Goods, in which is delimited the Z= oFeMaT. Section I says: When the coast presents beaches, the
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 20:37 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  12. Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    ... you bet & which means it is the law of the land in mexico under the mexican constitution a law doesnt have to be in the constitution to be legal He does
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 20:43 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  13. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    I ve been digging in the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States, and I think I ve arrived at the bottom of the question! More just as soon as I
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 21:02 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  14. Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    ... Ar= ticle 49 of Mexico s General Law of National Goods, in which is delimited the= Z= oFeMaT. Section I says: When the coast
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 21:10 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  15. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    Below, I quote in English translation from the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States (as amended through June 26, 2003), which clarifies several
    Sep 24, 2003 @ 23:41 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  16. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    ... Of course. I think his point was that, since it s only a statute and not in the constitution, the change for which he agitates can and should be
    Sep 25, 2003 @ 00:26 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  17. Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    ... shed. yes but that means it would need to be changed from its present status which is of legal federal territory & jurisdiction & which he finds so
    Sep 25, 2003 @ 02:18 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  18. Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    ... shed. yes but that means it would need to be changed from its present status which is of legal federal territory & jurisdiction & which he finds so
    Sep 25, 2003 @ 02:19 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  19. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    I feel that I am somewhat badly misunderstood, but we ll just have to agree to disagree. Lowell G. McManus Leesville, Louisiana, USA ... From: m06079
    Sep 25, 2003 @ 02:31 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  20. Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
    apologies for the inadvertent double post & i thought you made yourself misunderstood very well in any case we do appear to already agree to within 20 or 100
    Sep 25, 2003 @ 02:40 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)