Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
Date: Sep 24, 2003 @ 03:31
Author: Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


That is bizarre! Are you sure that the Mexican states don't even include the
beaches, or is it just a matter of federal government ownership of the beaches
(as landowner)?

Now that I know what I'm seeking, I'll attempt to look up the law when I have
more time.

Lowell G. McManus
Leesville, Louisiana, USA


----- Original Message -----
From: "m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>
To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:00 PM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation


> as i recall
> mexico is basically just like canada in reserving its entire maritime
> territory to the federal government
> except that canadian federal waters end & provincial territory begins
> at the low tide line
> whereas mexican federal maritime territory extends as far as the high
> tide line plus 10 or 20 horizontal meters of beach above & beyond that
>
> or in other words it is mexican federal seas plus beaches all in one
>
> the only catch is i cant recall whether it is 10 or 20 meters of beach
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus" <
> mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > I'm now catching up from being a week behind in reading BP messages, and I
find:
> >
> > > & it is a bit of a crisis because my ignorance of these internal maritime
> > > allocations is so great
> > > indeed except for a very few places like oz & nafta
> >
> > Although I consider myself a Mexiphile and researcher on most things
Mexican,
> > I've never know the republic's internal maritime allocation regime. Mike,
can
> > you enlighten me?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Lowell G. McManus
> > Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>