yes i finally am sure now thanx to you
http://www.mexicolaw.com/LawInfo30.htm
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus" <
mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> That is bizarre! Are you sure that the Mexican states don't even include the
> beaches, or is it just a matter of federal government ownership of the beaches
> (as landowner)?
>
> Now that I know what I'm seeking, I'll attempt to look up the law when I have
> more time.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "m06079" <barbaria_longa@h...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:00 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
>
>
> > as i recall
> > mexico is basically just like canada in reserving its entire maritime
> > territory to the federal government
> > except that canadian federal waters end & provincial territory begins
> > at the low tide line
> > whereas mexican federal maritime territory extends as far as the high
> > tide line plus 10 or 20 horizontal meters of beach above & beyond that
> >
> > or in other words it is mexican federal seas plus beaches all in one
> >
> > the only catch is i cant recall whether it is 10 or 20 meters of beach
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus" <
> > mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > > I'm now catching up from being a week behind in reading BP messages, and I
> find:
> > >
> > > > & it is a bit of a crisis because my ignorance of these internal maritime
> > > > allocations is so great
> > > > indeed except for a very few places like oz & nafta
> > >
> > > Although I consider myself a Mexiphile and researcher on most things
> Mexican,
> > > I've never know the republic's internal maritime allocation regime. Mike,
> can
> > > you enlighten me?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Lowell G. McManus
> > > Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >