the writer of this spanish text deplores that it is actual federal
jurisdiction
rather than merely federal ownership
http://www.noroeste.com.mx/Culiacan/20020807/nacional/FerOrrantia.php3
anyway
at least i am sure it is 20 meters now
whatever else you may find it is
for which good luck
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus" <
mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> So, are you saying that this URL makes you sure that the Zona Federal Maritimo
> Terrestre (ZoFeMaT) is beyond the jurisdiction of the states? It says to me
> only that the federal government owns the land and will lease it to the adjacent
> inland landowners. This situation is analygous to the right-of-way of any
> private-sector toll highway or railroad in the republic (federally owned; leased
> to private entity). I don't see anything at this URL addressing the question of
> state territorial jurisdiction over the beaches.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "m06079" <barbaria_longa@h...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:33 AM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
>
>
> > yes i finally am sure now thanx to you
> > http://www.mexicolaw.com/LawInfo30.htm
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus" <
> > mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > > That is bizarre! Are you sure that the Mexican states don't even include
> the
> > > beaches, or is it just a matter of federal government ownership of the
> beaches
> > > (as landowner)?
> > >
> > > Now that I know what I'm seeking, I'll attempt to look up the law when I
> have
> > > more time.
> > >
> > > Lowell G. McManus
> > > Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "m06079" <barbaria_longa@h...>
> > > To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:00 PM
> > > Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
> > >
> > >
> > > > as i recall
> > > > mexico is basically just like canada in reserving its entire maritime
> > > > territory to the federal government
> > > > except that canadian federal waters end & provincial territory begins
> > > > at the low tide line
> > > > whereas mexican federal maritime territory extends as far as the high
> > > > tide line plus 10 or 20 horizontal meters of beach above & beyond that
> > > >
> > > > or in other words it is mexican federal seas plus beaches all in one
> > > >
> > > > the only catch is i cant recall whether it is 10 or 20 meters of beach
> > > >
> > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus" <
> > > > mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > > > > I'm now catching up from being a week behind in reading BP messages, and
> I
> > > find:
> > > > >
> > > > > > & it is a bit of a crisis because my ignorance of these internal
> maritime
> > > > > > allocations is so great
> > > > > > indeed except for a very few places like oz & nafta
> > > > >
> > > > > Although I consider myself a Mexiphile and researcher on most things
> > > Mexican,
> > > > > I've never know the republic's internal maritime allocation regime.
> Mike,
> > > can
> > > > > you enlighten me?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Lowell G. McManus
> > > > > Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >