- Cooch Behar map (again)
As Brendan sent me his original tif-scans, I have put togehter, once again, a complete Cooch Behar map. The quality in the details is slightly better this
Jun 20, 2001 @ 07:17 - Mats Hessman (Mats Hessman <Mats@...>)
- Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
... nats & brendan here is another oldie but goldie & biggie i have still yet to access & apparently geocities is down at the moment too so i wonder if you can
Dec 10, 2001 @ 08:44 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
Geocities have removed all my files, because I didn t sport an index.htm-file. Obviously that was required. Michael, the map is here now:
Dec 10, 2001 @ 08:58 - Mats Hessman (Mats Hessman <blofeld_es@...>)
- Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
ahh wonderful mats & we are fairly leapfrogging to conclusions now for besides being able to see it whole & more clearly we have your arrows & eagle eye while
Dec 10, 2001 @ 10:15 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
... I don t wish to violate Brendan s copyright by scanning his excellent paper map, but this is what I read from it: - 35 and the Patgram salient could well
Dec 10, 2001 @ 10:26 - Mats Hessman (Mats Hessman <blofeld_es@...>)
- Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
ah mats i see you are talking about pink 50 & 51 whereas brendan was referring to green 50 & 51 in message 2949 so possibly only a color flop has occurred
Dec 10, 2001 @ 10:37 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
... Michael, I should have used the colors to clarify. Here are my observations again, with respect to Brendans compiled paper map: - Green 35 and the Patgram
Dec 10, 2001 @ 10:41 - Mats Hessman (Mats Hessman <blofeld_es@...>)
- Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
... ok thanx i needed that because i cant see your second patgram salient on this map & now i cant wait til brendan wakes up either so i can find out what the
Dec 10, 2001 @ 11:08 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
... Yes, Jote Nijama (Bangladeshi 35 in India) and the Patgram slaient seem to be connected at a point on 1-inch british maps, from which my paper map has been
Dec 11, 2001 @ 00:33 - Brendan Whyte ("Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
Boundary crosses (ie quadpoints shared by only 2 countries, not 4) exist in 4 places, only three of which are confirmed: at Baarle (1), at Jungholz (1) and at
Dec 11, 2001 @ 00:38 - Brendan Whyte ("Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>)
- Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
thanxx many brendan & there is great celebration in the land now that we finally have your best advice & consent on these 2 beauties which you may recall
Dec 11, 2001 @ 01:37 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)