1. Cooch Behar map (again)
    As Brendan sent me his original tif-scans, I have put togehter, once again, a complete Cooch Behar map. The quality in the details is slightly better this
    Jun 20, 2001 @ 07:17 - Mats Hessman (Mats Hessman <Mats@...>)
  2. Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
    ... nats & brendan here is another oldie but goldie & biggie i have still yet to access & apparently geocities is down at the moment too so i wonder if you can
    Dec 10, 2001 @ 08:44 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  3. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
    Geocities have removed all my files, because I didn t sport an index.htm-file. Obviously that was required. Michael, the map is here now:
    Dec 10, 2001 @ 08:58 - Mats Hessman (Mats Hessman <blofeld_es@...>)
  4. Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
    ahh wonderful mats & we are fairly leapfrogging to conclusions now for besides being able to see it whole & more clearly we have your arrows & eagle eye while
    Dec 10, 2001 @ 10:15 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  5. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
    ... I don t wish to violate Brendan s copyright by scanning his excellent paper map, but this is what I read from it: - 35 and the Patgram salient could well
    Dec 10, 2001 @ 10:26 - Mats Hessman (Mats Hessman <blofeld_es@...>)
  6. Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
    ah mats i see you are talking about pink 50 & 51 whereas brendan was referring to green 50 & 51 in message 2949 so possibly only a color flop has occurred
    Dec 10, 2001 @ 10:37 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  7. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
    ... Michael, I should have used the colors to clarify. Here are my observations again, with respect to Brendans compiled paper map: - Green 35 and the Patgram
    Dec 10, 2001 @ 10:41 - Mats Hessman (Mats Hessman <blofeld_es@...>)
  8. Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
    ... ok thanx i needed that because i cant see your second patgram salient on this map & now i cant wait til brendan wakes up either so i can find out what the
    Dec 10, 2001 @ 11:08 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  9. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
    ... Yes, Jote Nijama (Bangladeshi 35 in India) and the Patgram slaient seem to be connected at a point on 1-inch british maps, from which my paper map has been
    Dec 11, 2001 @ 00:33 - Brendan Whyte ("Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>)
  10. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
    Boundary crosses (ie quadpoints shared by only 2 countries, not 4) exist in 4 places, only three of which are confirmed: at Baarle (1), at Jungholz (1) and at
    Dec 11, 2001 @ 00:38 - Brendan Whyte ("Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>)
  11. Re: Cooch Behar map (again)
    thanxx many brendan & there is great celebration in the land now that we finally have your best advice & consent on these 2 beauties which you may recall
    Dec 11, 2001 @ 01:37 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)