Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar map (again)<br/>
Date: Dec 10, 2001 @ 10:41<br/>
Author: Mats Hessman (Mats Hessman &lt;blofeld_es@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5042.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5044.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic2951.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5042.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5044.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-58475601"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt;ah mats i see you are talking about pink 50 & 51 whereas <br/>
&gt;brendan was referring to green 50 & 51 in message 2949 <br/>
&gt;so possibly only a color flop has occurred somewhere m<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Michael, I should have used the colors to clarify.<br/>
Here are my observations again, with respect to Brendans<br/>
compiled paper map:<br/>
<br/>
- Green 35 and the Patgram salient could well be connected<br/>
at just one point. They connect on the map.<br/>
<br/>
- Green 50 and green 51 are definately not connected.<br/>
<br/>
- Instead, green 50 and the Patgram salient could<br/>
very well be connected at a point.<br/>
<br/>
Mats</div>