Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar map (again)<br/>
Date: Dec 11, 2001 @ 00:33<br/>
Author: Brendan Whyte (&quot;Brendan Whyte&quot; &lt;brwhyte@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5044.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5063.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic2951.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5061.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5063.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-497466051"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt;- 35 and the Patgram salient could well be connected<br/>
&gt;at just one point. They connect on the map.<br/>
&gt;<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Yes, Jote Nijama (Bangladeshi 35 in India) and the Patgram slaient seem to <br/>
be connected at a point on 1-inch british maps, from which my paper map has <br/>
been mainly compiled.<br/>
Bangladeshi 50, Bara Saradubi, is connected by as single point to Bangladesh <br/>
mainland, confirmed from demarcation report of 1940.<br/>
<br/>
Remember that there are parallel numberings. There is an Indian 1 in <br/>
Bangladehs and a Bangladeshi 1 in India, etc.<br/>
<br/>
Brendan<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
_________________________________________________________________<br/>
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp">http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp</a></div>