Subject: Re: Cooch Behar map (again)<br/>
Date: Dec 10, 2001 @ 08:44<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="2951.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5038.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic2951.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5036.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5038.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1147003628">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., Mats Hessman &lt;Mats@l...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; As Brendan sent me his original tif-scans, I have put<br/>
<br/>
&gt; togehter, once again, a complete Cooch Behar map.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; The quality in the details is slightly better this<br/>
<br/>
&gt; time, and I have also marked the positions of the<br/>
<br/>
&gt; counter-counter-exclave and the two presumed <br/>
<br/>
&gt; quadripoints. All this thanks to Brendan, of course.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Sorry to say, but the size of the file is still <br/>
<br/>
&gt; around 2 MBytes.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; www.geocities.com/exclaves/CoochBehar_Annotated.gif<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Nats<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>nats & brendan here is another oldie but goldie & biggie i have still yet to access & apparently geocities is down at the moment too so i wonder if you can tell me in the meantime whether the presumption here about the quadripoints is your own mats or yours too now brendan & whether we are indeed talking about real boundary crosses here like those confirmed at jungholz & baarle because i think brendan you were at one time very doubtful of their existence in bengal & while i have no new reason to be optimistic of confirming additional worldclass boundary crosses other than this word presumed here i am still very desirous to learn of any new movement in the search for them as for example in the final survey for the dissertation or anyhow m</div>