Subject: Re: Cooch Behar map (again)<br/>
Date: Dec 10, 2001 @ 11:08<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5043.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5062.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic2951.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5043.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5045.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-2039179995">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., Mats Hessman &lt;blofeld_es@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt;ah mats i see you are talking about pink 50 & 51 whereas <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt;brendan was referring to green 50 & 51 in message 2949 <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt;so possibly only a color flop has occurred somewhere m<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Michael, I should have used the colors to clarify.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; Here are my observations again, with respect to Brendans<br/>
<br/>
&gt; compiled paper map:<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; - Green 35 and the Patgram salient could well be connected<br/>
<br/>
&gt; at just one point. They connect on the map.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; - Green 50 and green 51 are definately not connected.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; - Instead, green 50 and the Patgram salient could<br/>
<br/>
&gt; very well be connected at a point.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Mats<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>ok thanx i needed that because i cant see your second patgram salient on this map & now i cant wait til brendan wakes up either so i can find out what the heck he was talking about in 2949 because even tho nothing matches i would still like to believe we are hot on the trail of a double breakthru here in this most awesome of categories m</div>