Subject: Re: Cooch Behar map (again)<br/>
Date: Dec 10, 2001 @ 10:37<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5041.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5043.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic2951.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5041.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5043.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1854743077">ah mats i see you are talking about pink 50 & 51 whereas brendan was referring to green 50 & 51 in message 2949 so possibly only a color flop has occurred somewhere m<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., Mats Hessman &lt;blofeld_es@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt;do you guys or dont you agree from the data so <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt;far that your number 2 is highly probable & your <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt;number 1 also still has a wing & a prayer too<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; I don&#39;t wish to violate Brendan&#39;s copyright by<br/>
<br/>
&gt; scanning his excellent paper map, but this is what<br/>
<br/>
&gt; I read from it:<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; - 35 and the Patgram salient could well be connected<br/>
<br/>
&gt; at just one point. They connect on the map.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; - 50 and 51 are definately not connected.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; - Instead, 50 and the Patgram salient could<br/>
<br/>
&gt; very well be connected at a point.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; I suppose we will need the coordinates to <br/>
<br/>
&gt; be quite sure.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Also: <br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; - 51 is quite clearly shown within 19, which<br/>
<br/>
&gt; is in turn within 47.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Mats </span></blockquote></div>