1. no mxus for xmus after all but its ajo ho
    got about halfway from gila bend to yuma last night or as far as dateland in fact tho i didnt land a date & slept fitfully besides on my plan of continuing
    Dec 23, 2004 @ 19:08 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  2. Re: [BoundaryPoint] no mxus for xmus after all but its ajo ho
    The BODAHOMA quadripoint that you have chosen for your goal is unmonumented and in the midst of a farm field. See http://tinyurl.com/3rx7s on TerraServer and
    Dec 23, 2004 @ 22:34 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  3. arrowhead az Re: no mxus for xmus after all but its ajo ho
    thanx doug & lowell too very interesting but does unmonumented necessarily mean unmarked & how then do they mark or even know the county lines there anyway let
    Dec 25, 2004 @ 00:50 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  4. Re: [BoundaryPoint] arrowhead az Re: no mxus for xmus after all but its ajo ho
    ... I was using unmonumented to mean unmarked. It would be difficult for any physical mark to survive in a plowed farm field. There might be signage on
    Dec 26, 2004 @ 05:09 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  5. Re: [BoundaryPoint] arrowhead az Re: no mxus for xmus after all but its ajo ho
    Lowell G. McManus wrote: ... I was using unmonumented to mean unmarked. It would be difficult for any physical mark to survive in
    Dec 26, 2004 @ 20:54 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  6. Re: [BoundaryPoint] arrowhead az Re: no mxus for xmus after all but its ajo ho
    Mike, I m basing my statement on the lack of a monument at the quadripoint in question on: (1) no monument indicated on USGS topo; and (2) the 1991 aerial
    Dec 26, 2004 @ 22:34 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  7. arrowhead az Re: no mxus for xmus after all but its ajo ho
    inserts hurriedly ... quadripoint in question on: (1) no monument indicated on USGS topo; as you know this in itself is neither here nor there ... harvested
    Dec 26, 2004 @ 23:00 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  8. arrowhead az Re: no mxus for xmus after all but its ajo ho
    new computer & more inserts less hurriedly ... week ... much ... site. ... survey. ... the ... about ... impossible. ... broadband ... second ... 125.7 ... ok
    Dec 26, 2004 @ 23:11 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  9. arrowhead az Re: no mxus for xmus after all but its ajo ho
    lowell ... on- ... for ... ok i finally got thru there but the bigger drawback is that the contents of each file are fragmented into thousands & thousands of
    Dec 26, 2004 @ 23:43 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  10. Re: [BoundaryPoint] arrowhead az Re: no mxus for xmus after all but its ajo ho
    Mike D., Okay, I ll consider myself severely chastised, but I was only trying to help you. In my initial pronouncement on the Borden-Dawson-Howard-Martin
    Dec 27, 2004 @ 01:28 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  11. Re: [BoundaryPoint] arrowhead az Re: no mxus for xmus after all but its ajo ho
    insertions at leisure Lowell G. McManus wrote: Mike D., Okay, I ll consider myself severely chastised yikes hahahaha but why i was
    Dec 27, 2004 @ 18:47 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  12. arrowhead az Re: no mxus for xmus after all but its ajo ho
    have been laughing especially at this part of our misunderstanding much of the way from surprise to superior ... several members ... anyway. If I ...
    Dec 27, 2004 @ 23:57 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)