Subject: arrowhead az Re: no mxus for xmus after all but its ajo ho<br/>
Date: Dec 27, 2004 @ 23:57<br/>
Author: aletheiak (&quot;aletheiak&quot; &lt;aletheiak@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="16362.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic16340.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="16366.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="16368.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1150986507">have been laughing especially at this part of our misunderstanding <br/>
much of the way from surprise to superior<br/>
<br/>
--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Lowell G. McManus&quot; <br/>
&lt;mcmanus71496@m...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; I have trimmed my replies, not to cover any tracks, but because <br/>
 </span></blockquote>several members<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; have asked posters to do so.  It&#39;s all there in the archives <br/>
 </span></blockquote>anyway.  If I<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; really wanted to hide a past post, I could delete it from the <br/>
 </span></blockquote>archives.<br/>
<br/>
for of course when i said<br/>
even as you progressively cover your tracks by cutting the texts<br/>
i didnt mean i thought you were deliberately covering up here<br/>
but only that your cuts had had the effect of making the very sources <br/>
you were apparently presuming from & that i therefore increasingly <br/>
needed to double check all the less accessible to me<br/>
thus covering your tracks in that circumstantial sense only <br/>
& not deliberately covering up <br/>
as you chose to understand me<br/>
presumably in jest yourself<br/>
or at least that is my provisional happy ending <br/>
because i cant believe you really felt chastised at all by what i <br/>
actually meant & said<br/>
let alone severely so</div>