1. BYLTLV remark
    Thanks, Peter S. for your effort on translating this official document on fixing this tp - I really appreciate your work - and am looking forward to meeting
    Apr 01, 2003 @ 06:52 - Peter Hering (Peter Hering <hering@...>)
  2. Re: BYLTLV remark
    You re welcome, of course. Yes, I ve seen the pics and read story on Jan s homepage. It was actually very nice to see that the pictures very nicely matched
    Apr 01, 2003 @ 11:29 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  3. Re: BYLTLV remark
    ... But if ... Jan s ... be ... right so it is simple find the protocol if you feel you must but my point was that your translated text creates the expectation
    Apr 01, 2003 @ 22:48 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  4. Re: BYLTLV remark
    ... OR RATHER NONSITUATION Mike s right here. The IS NO neutral zone, no triudominium, no nothing. It is a simple TP. It is not a mistery. A trinational
    Apr 02, 2003 @ 01:03 - Karolis B. ("Karolis B." <kbajoraz@...>)
  5. Re: BYLTLV remark
    thanxx for both these sensible & kind messages karolis & i am so glad to find you do at least sometimes understand me & so greatly encouraged to continue my
    Apr 02, 2003 @ 01:28 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  6. Re: BYLTLV remark
    ... nice ... it ! :) ... Right. I was under the impression that you meant something different here. Sometimes it is a bit difficult to understand your writing,
    Apr 02, 2003 @ 09:44 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  7. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: BYLTLV remark
    Sorry that I did not respond to this message before - last month I have been very busy. I was writing «neutral territory» (sic!), and I understood it like
    Apr 02, 2003 @ 10:05 - Jan S. Krogh ("Jan S. Krogh" <jan.krogh@...>)
  8. Re: BYLTLV remark
    Thanks, mate. That s cleared up then. Sorry to have woken you up... (just kidding of course) Peter S. ... have been ... like border ... country ...
    Apr 02, 2003 @ 10:11 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  9. Re: BYLTLV remark
    ... may pass ... included in the ... platform!) ... I would be thrilled if you could drop a link to that or the text, Jan! please I ve read the PLLT border
    Apr 03, 2003 @ 03:10 - Karolis B. ("Karolis B." <kbajoraz@...>)
  10. global condoscopy was Re: BYLTLV remark
    peter ... and ... the ... also neutral may not be the exactly right word where not just 2 but several parties are involved & where all are included rather than
    Apr 03, 2003 @ 16:04 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  11. global condoscopy was Re: BYLTLV remark
    oops first link below needs a hand as usual & i think i may have fixed the 3rd link in text but it may still need hand cobbling too oops so please try again
    Apr 03, 2003 @ 16:20 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  12. global condoscopy was Re: BYLTLV remark
    one more try at the third link below ... is ... http://www.americas.org/news/nir/20021021_finding_renews_b ...
    Apr 03, 2003 @ 16:24 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)