Subject: global condoscopy was Re: BYLTLV remark<br/>
Date: Apr 03, 2003 @ 16:20<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="9568.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9570.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic9516.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="9568.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9570.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1404656432">oops<br/>
first link below needs a hand as usual<br/>
& i think i may have fixed the 3rd link in text<br/>
but it may still need hand cobbling too<br/>
oops<br/>
so please try again now if you would<br/>
apologies<br/>
<br/>
--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, &quot;acroorca2002&quot; <br/>
&lt;orc@o...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; peter <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; Because if it really is neutral, I would find this very special <br/>
&gt; and <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; interesting! I don&#39;t know of any other tripoints where this is <br/>
&gt; the <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; case.<br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; not exactly like this situation<br/>
&gt; &gt; or rather nonsituation<br/>
&gt; &gt; but of course hnnisv is a real legal tridominium<br/>
&gt; &gt; tho it is not yet fully delineated or marked<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; also neutral may not be the exactly right word <br/>
&gt; where not just 2 but several parties are involved<br/>
&gt; & where all are included rather than excluded from the area<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; in this case i think condominium may be the better word<br/>
&gt; or tridominium<br/>
&gt; tho i am being partly silly too since it is a noncase<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; but for some clues to why the exact triarea of the globally <br/>
 </span></blockquote>unique <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; hnnisv tridominium remains so elusive & fuzzy for so many <br/>
 </span></blockquote>years <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; now after the icj ordered it up<br/>
&gt; <br/>
 </span></blockquote>http://www.americas.org/news/nir/20021021_finding_renews_b<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; order_dispute.asp<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; & for some first glimpses of what it looks like in & around the <br/>
&gt; tridominium area<br/>
&gt; http://mitchnts1.cr.usgs.gov/projects/maphabitats.html<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; & for a space shot of the entire area & environs<br/>
&gt; suggesting how difficult it will be to finally draw the coastal <br/>
&gt; baselines from mainland & islands & to project the 3nm of <br/>
&gt; territorial waters from them that are reserved to the individual <br/>
&gt; countries before the condominial territory remaining in the <br/>
&gt; middle can be precisely delineated<br/>
&gt; <br/>
 </span></blockquote>http://.www.nationalgeographic.com/wildworld/profiles/terrestrial/<br/>
nt/nt1412.html<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt;  <br/>
&gt; &gt; & didnt you find signs of a trido at cnkpru too<br/>
&gt; &gt; or what was the story there<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; i have tracked this down & it is a bust<br/>
&gt; just a cnkp condo<br/>
&gt; to add to<br/>
&gt; 1 aeom <br/>
&gt; 2 delus & <br/>
&gt; 2 esfrs<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; thus including these latter 2 sets of twins<br/>
&gt; a total of 7 & only 7 world class condo areas are yet known<br/>
&gt; several producing trilines instead of tripoints<br/>
&gt; but only 1 legal triarea in the world<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; footnote<br/>
&gt; atchde perhaps deserves an asterisk here<br/>
&gt; since we have entertained the idea that it may be a legal triarea<br/>
&gt; but no hard evidence of condominial status has been <br/>
 </span></blockquote>produced<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; & i believe an equidistance tripoint is a much more likely <br/>
&gt; eventuality in this case </span></blockquote></div>