1. Kokkina
    Hi, My names Andrew, I m from Scotland and have been following posts for a while with interest. I ve unfortunately not been to as many borders as I d like! But
    Oct 27, 2002 @ 20:38 - rogart10 ("rogart10" <rogart10@...>)
  2. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Kokkina
    I will be pressing F5 on my keyboard until that photo arrives in my inbox, Andrew. Jesper ... From: rogart10 To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday,
    Oct 27, 2002 @ 20:41 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  3. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Kokkina
    Funny this should have been discussed yesterday, as I visited the area around Kokkina yesterday and took photos of Kokkina and the surrounding countryside,
    Oct 28, 2002 @ 09:46 - Nicholas F Hodder ("Nicholas F Hodder" <lists@...>)
  4. Kokkina
    I haven t heard of Kokkina/Erenköy since I visited this website a few minutes ago, but I take the liberty to assume the enclave still exist. I know mentioning
    Sep 14, 2004 @ 19:43 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  5. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Kokkina
    ... It was certainly still there when I was in Cyprus last year. The area was heavily guarded by UN troops, and it wasn t possible to enter. I managed to take
    Sep 15, 2004 @ 07:43 - Kevin Meynell (Kevin Meynell <knm@...>)
  6. Re: Kokkina
    Is Kokkina really an enclave [exclave]? That would, it seems to me, depend on who exercizes sovereignty over the water off the coast to the open sea. LN ...
    Sep 16, 2004 @ 02:07 - L. A. Nadybal ("L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>)
  7. Re: Kokkina
    kokkina is really a de facto political exclave but because there is no agreement between cyprus proper & turkish cyprus delimiting their respective seas as
    Sep 16, 2004 @ 02:25 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  8. Re: Kokkina
    It may be knowable if the Turks support the town only by sea - I can t imagine the UN is allowing military transports across it s surrounding sector. If we
    Sep 16, 2004 @ 02:34 - L. A. Nadybal ("L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>)
  9. Re: Kokkina
    beyond the coastal baselines every innocently passing ship in the night exercises de facto sovereignty over its immediate vicinity as well as de jure
    Sep 16, 2004 @ 02:39 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  10. Re: Kokkina
    No agree. When a ship is in someone s territorial waters it s surrounding sovereignty is zero. Even the insides are not sovereign - the captain may be
    Sep 17, 2004 @ 00:32 - L. A. Nadybal ("L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>)
  11. Re: Kokkina
    ... yes but de facto everybody makes way for it unless they are nuts they even avoid the propellers aft & below & if they are much smaller they avoid the wakes
    Sep 17, 2004 @ 01:15 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)