1. Breitenstein pictures in Photos section!
    And now the Alsatian monster, the Breitenstein. I have taken another four pictures of it. Later on, I will show you pictures of the Drei- Peterstein and the
    Aug 28, 2001 @ 21:53 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  2. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Breitenstein pictures in Photos section!
    thanx peter for these top notch words they seem to indicate the monster is no longer functional as a boundary marker of any kind thus no longer a candidate for
    Aug 29, 2001 @ 19:51 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  3. Re: Breitenstein pictures in Photos section!
    I m not sure. The 25k topo map of the area I have seems to indicate it is no longer a working stone. But this possibly is because the border is depicted on the
    Aug 29, 2001 @ 20:08 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  4. Re: Breitenstein pictures in Photos section!
    ... ... The answer is yes for the Spitzstein (although it still could be on a municipal border - the other side of the road problem again), but definitely a
    Aug 29, 2001 @ 20:13 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  5. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Breitenstein pictures in Photos section!
    yes thank goodness you have elaborated on this & it is all exactly as i thought cant trust local authority even when written on signs must go to sources & from
    Aug 29, 2001 @ 20:33 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  6. Re: Breitenstein pictures in Photos section!
    ... No. The Trois Pierres are still on the border (well, not actually on the border, which is a bit difficult for three stones acting as one boundary marker,
    Aug 29, 2001 @ 20:48 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  7. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Breitenstein pictures in Photos section!
    yes & yes but how can you say no & then well yes isnt it rather yes but then well not exactly m ...
    Aug 29, 2001 @ 22:04 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)