Subject: Re: Breitenstein pictures in Photos section!<br/>
Date: Aug 29, 2001 @ 20:13<br/>
Author: Peter Smaardijk (&quot;Peter Smaardijk&quot; &lt;smaardijk@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="3770.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="3773.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic3767.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="3770.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="3772.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-456118936">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;m donner&quot; &lt;maxivan82@h...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; & is such a loss of eminence also true of its 2 companion candidates<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>... The answer is yes for the Spitzstein (although it still could be <br/>
on a municipal border - the &quot;other side of the road&quot; problem again), <br/>
but definitely a no for the Drei-Peterstein. The name means &quot;Three <br/>
Peters Stone&quot;, but is more likely a wrong translation of the <br/>
French &quot;Trois Pierres&quot;, meaning not only Three Peters, but also Three <br/>
Stones. And that&#39;s what it is. But in the middle of these three - no <br/>
doubt very old - stones, there is a more recent boundary marker, that <br/>
very really marks the boundary between Alsace and Lorraine.<br/>
<br/>
Peter S.</div>