1. New Wall -- discussion point
    There hasn t been much said about the security fence that Israel is building. Some of the pictures of the massive wall are stunning. Some look like Berlin
    Jan 13, 2004 @ 18:44 - Doug Murray (Doug Murray <doug@...>)
  2. Re: [BoundaryPoint] New Wall -- discussion point
    To the extent that this security fence relates to a current or proposed political boundary (which is not clear to me), then a respectful and collegial
    Jan 13, 2004 @ 20:10 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  3. Re: [BoundaryPoint] New Wall -- discussion point
    I ll see if I can snap some pictures when I get the chance. Keep in mind that the fence/wall doesn t correspond to either current or pre-1967 borders, and it s
    Jan 13, 2004 @ 20:15 - Asher Samuels (Asher Samuels <asher972@...>)
  4. Re: [BoundaryPoint] New Wall -- discussion point
    The pictures I ve seen are stunning. I can t believe how big it is. One website compared it to the Berlin Wall -- and how small it made that wall look.
    Jan 13, 2004 @ 21:26 - Doug Murray (Doug Murray <doug@...>)
  5. Re: [BoundaryPoint] New Wall -- discussion point
    Ok, I don t mean to be political or anything, but I don t think the Israelis would allow any Israeli area to be cut off when creating the all. After all, the
    Jan 14, 2004 @ 02:30 - Arif Samad (Arif Samad <fHoiberg@...>)
  6. Re: [BoundaryPoint] New Wall -- discussion point
    wait lowell wait everybody what do you mean the purposes of this group what do you think the purposes of this group are you are on to something important here
    Jan 14, 2004 @ 17:00 - Michael Donner ("Michael Donner" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  7. Re: New Wall -- discussion point
    ... proposed ... and collegial ... expressions of rank ... purposes of this ... i see everybody has been contemplating my question for days now or doesnt want
    Jan 16, 2004 @ 16:13 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  8. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: New Wall -- discussion point
    My responses are inserted below. Lowell ... From: m06079 To: Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004
    Jan 16, 2004 @ 17:55 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  9. Re: New Wall -- discussion point
    ... answer that ... that no one ... wall. I am ... claimed ... told you what ... kept telling ... cmon you know there was nothing viscious about it now thats
    Jan 17, 2004 @ 15:30 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  10. Re: New Wall -- discussion point
    ... respectful ... thats ok & i meant & said what do you think they are & i accept your answer does anyone else want to actually answer i admit i have some
    Jan 17, 2004 @ 16:10 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  11. Re: New Wall -- discussion point
    ... answer that ... that no one ... wall. I am ... claimed ... told you what ... kept telling ... particular words I ... but don t just ... from ... states
    Jan 17, 2004 @ 16:28 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  12. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: New Wall -- discussion point
    Mike, I again insert my responses below. Lowell G. McManus Leesville, Louisiana, USA ... From: m06079 To:
    Jan 17, 2004 @ 23:08 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  13. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: New Wall -- discussion point
    ... I wonder how many lawyers the Geological Survey really has? I somehow doubt that this was vetted by lawyers. I think lawyers usually consult forensic
    Jan 18, 2004 @ 01:51 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  14. Re: New Wall -- discussion point
    ... department ... somehow doubt ... forensic ... around. For ... legally-oriented ... i dont know how many lawyers but vetting by legal expertise on retainer
    Jan 20, 2004 @ 18:58 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
  15. Re: New Wall -- discussion point
    ... due ... 1964, ... good sleuthing & these could well have been the only 1966 edition insertions into the footnote sequence of the 1930 edition & i have
    Jan 20, 2004 @ 20:00 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  16. Re: New Wall -- discussion point
    ... or ... respectful ... now ... hoped ... based. ... exactly you ... I ... another. I meant ... after all. i know & you know i am just having fun with you
    Jan 20, 2004 @ 21:05 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)