1. colorado double bordercross quintipoint claim is a bust
    it was too good to be true as previously reported circa message 5301 or 5306 http://www.ci.broomfield.co.us/maps/proposedannexationmap.s html shows at lower
    Apr 13, 2003 @ 02:12 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  2. Re: colorado double bordercross quintipoint claim is a bust
    apologies for the broken urls as usual but on the other hand i figure everybody must know how to deal with these by now too anyway a closer & clearer look at
    Apr 13, 2003 @ 16:17 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  3. Re: [BoundaryPoint] colorado double bordercross quintipoint claim is a bust
    You are probably right about the fact that the quintipoint does not exist, but I am not sure what corporate boundaries mean. I know the county boundaries
    Apr 15, 2003 @ 23:06 - Arif Samad (Arif Samad <fHoiberg@...>)
  4. Re: colorado double bordercross quintipoint claim is a bust
    Corporate boundaries are the limits within which a city or town or other jurisdiction exists as a juridicial person - that has rights and responsibilities such
    Apr 16, 2003 @ 00:42 - L. A. Nadybal ("L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>)
  5. Re: colorado double bordercross quintipoint claim is a bust
    arif thanx all i meant by corporate boundaries is the municipal boundaries themselves & i only used this term because the topos in this area specify it but i
    Apr 16, 2003 @ 04:51 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  6. Re: colorado double bordercross quintipoint claim is a bust
    Thanks for putting my answer to Arif s question down as irrelevant. LN
    Apr 16, 2003 @ 13:43 - L. A. Nadybal ("L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>)
  7. Re: colorado double bordercross quintipoint claim is a bust
    ... irrelevant. you are welcome i realized you might conclude that & leap to be put down even after i was careful to concede it may be interesting but to be
    Apr 16, 2003 @ 15:16 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)