1. Re: Marcel
    ... any case ... Perhaps the partition treaty of Cerdanya (Treaty of Llívia, 12/11/1660), mentions the stone. Next monday I will be able to confirm it,
    Nov 30, 2001 @ 21:30 - marcelmiquel@navegalia.com (<marcelmiquel@...>)
  2. Re: Marcel
    glad to learn you are pursuing this further marcel & look forward to your= report from the 1660 text for it seems likely you will find this stone men=
    Dec 01, 2001 @ 03:36 - orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)
  3. Re: Marcel
    Hello, Consulted the treaty of Llívia ( nov. 12th, 1660 ), there is no mention to any border marker. From 1660 to 1868 ( delimition act ) the spanish/french
    Dec 03, 2001 @ 12:58 - marcelmiquel@navegalia.com (<marcelmiquel@navegalia.com>)
  4. Re: Marcel
    ... (...)I think the pedra dreta as a undisputed boundary limit is clear, because the marker number 1 is placed there, and according the delimitation act
    Dec 03, 2001 @ 17:35 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  5. Re: Marcel
    it is a thin line but when modern stones actually abut or are combined with= their predecessors it might be fair to say the predecessors are still regu= lar
    Dec 04, 2001 @ 01:47 - orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)
  6. Re: Marcel
    well marcel you have traced this as well as could be & it really does ap= pear to have been a working intermunicipal rock since 1660 at latest if not=
    Dec 04, 2001 @ 04:05 - orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)