--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., <marcelmiquel@n...> wrote:
(...)I think the "pedra dreta" as a undisputed boundary limit is
clear, because the marker number 1 is placed there, and according the
delimitation act :"next to the old stone who has been the boundary of
> Llívia, Ur and Càldegues". So we can assume that from 1660 from
1868 this stone was a international boundary marker "de facto",
despite it was not mentioned in a treaty, just because a treaty of
limits didn't exist.

Do (or don't) I understand correctly that it isn't a working stone
anymore? Because I see here the Pyrenean habit of putting boundary
stones (new ones) next to older boundary stones, which releaves the
old one of its duty. This happened at both St. Martins Stone and
Irumugak, if I recall correctly.

Peter S.