1. TX proposes "free-for-all brawl" with NM over land
    The Commissioner of the General Land Office of the State of Texas has proposed a free-for-all brawl between the Senates of the two states over the lost land
    Mar 13, 2005 @ 01:30 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  2. Re: TX proposes "free-for-all brawl" with NM over land
    I have an article with several links on my americasroof blog on this: http://americasroof.com/wp/archives/2005/03/13/new-mexico-sues-texas/ The upshot is that
    Mar 14, 2005 @ 03:40 - Roger_Rowlett ("Roger_Rowlett" <roger.rowlett@...>)
  3. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: TX proposes "free-for-all brawl" with NM over land
    By even considering any suit on this issue, New Mexico is engaging in a total waste of time, money, and breath. The reasons go far beyond the doctrine that
    Mar 14, 2005 @ 04:31 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  4. nmtx laffs & a serious question about high points
    thanx roger & thats a great site you have there too i would only add about nmoktx that it is indeed much closer to the 103rd meridian than txnw is & may well
    Mar 14, 2005 @ 16:15 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  5. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: TX proposes "free-for-all brawl" with NM over land
    The reason nmtx then turns east at the northern line of tx for three miles until it reaches the ok n/s line is that north of tx, the 103rd meridian is the ok
    Mar 14, 2005 @ 17:11 - Flynn, Kevin ("Flynn, Kevin" <flynnk@...>)
  6. Re: TX proposes "free-for-all brawl" with NM over land
    Kevin: The Oklahoma panhandle is more or less the 103rd meredian (although the tristate marker is off by a few feet as Altheia noted). The photos on my page
    Mar 14, 2005 @ 17:50 - Roger_Rowlett ("Roger_Rowlett" <roger.rowlett@...>)
  7. Re: nmtx laffs & a serious question about high points
    Altheia: Thanks for the nice comments. Anyway several years ago I set up a page on the highest points of Europe based on a version of the CIA Factbook and
    Mar 14, 2005 @ 18:01 - Roger_Rowlett ("Roger_Rowlett" <roger.rowlett@...>)
  8. Re: TX proposes "free-for-all brawl" with NM over land
    Sorry for the correction, I meant to say there is benchmark further east of the tristate marker and closer to the meridian. ... the ... interesting ... this
    Mar 14, 2005 @ 18:04 - Roger_Rowlett ("Roger_Rowlett" <roger.rowlett@...>)
  9. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: TX proposes "free-for-all brawl" with NM over land
    Yes. NMTX is 103° as surveyed by Clark in 1859, and NMOK is the Cimarron Meridian (nominally103°, but still imperfect) as surveyed by Chaney and Smith of
    Mar 14, 2005 @ 18:19 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  10. Re: TX proposes "free-for-all brawl" with NM over land
    yes right roger & there are indeed several more of the same style due north of the tristate marker along the nmok state line & yes this nmoktx marker & other
    Mar 14, 2005 @ 21:12 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  11. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: nmtx laffs & a serious question about high points
    thanx this goes a good ways toward the desired end since i think we can safely rule europe out entirely at least based on your data here & perhaps you could
    Mar 14, 2005 @ 21:26 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)