1. new ellis boundary was finalized in 1999
    confirmation at last in a little note buried in the back of the summer 1998 issue of professional surveyor magazine the supreme court quietly issued its final
    May 14, 2003 @ 04:23 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  2. Re: new ellis boundary was finalized in 1999
    wait the part about the obelisk is needlessly confusing there is no obelisk in this picture & azconmut really should get the basilisk in honor of its mythic
    May 14, 2003 @ 13:34 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  3. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new ellis boundary was finalized in 1999
    ... There is ALWAYS some possible objection. :-) In this case, I m certain some would argue that DCVA deserves consideration, even though DC isn t technically
    May 14, 2003 @ 14:16 - S.D. Rhodes ("S.D. Rhodes" <rhodent@...>)
  4. Re: new ellis boundary was finalized in 1999
    ... hahaha you are absolutely right pal & the united states is certainly a state besides so with dc we really are talking interstate boundaries of a sort even
    May 14, 2003 @ 16:35 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  5. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new ellis boundary was finalized in 1999
    ... You would have to think wrong, then. :-) I was only pointing out what people could argue (I don t buy DCVA or DCMD in any case...more on this in a second),
    May 14, 2003 @ 21:40 - S.D. Rhodes ("S.D. Rhodes" <rhodent@...>)
  6. Re: new ellis boundary was finalized in 1999
    ... deserves ... hahaaah good one ... hahaha indeed there is no limit to what people could argue haha hahahahaha ... everyone ... arguing ... yes but first
    May 15, 2003 @ 03:14 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)