Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new ellis boundary was finalized in 1999<br/>
Date: May 14, 2003 @ 14:16<br/>
Author: S.D. Rhodes (&quot;S.D. Rhodes&quot; &lt;rhodent@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="10088.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="10091.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic10086.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="10088.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="10090.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-991137828"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt;ah yes depa<br/>
&gt;which was inadvertently left out of this latest summary<br/>
&gt;but certainly not forgotten<br/>
&gt;since it is the shortest entire state line<br/>
&gt;i believe without any possible objection<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>There is ALWAYS some possible objection. :-)<br/>
<br/>
In this case, I&#39;m certain some would argue that DCVA deserves<br/>
consideration, even though DC isn&#39;t technically a state.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
---<br/>
&quot;If you hate dissent, then get out of the United States.&quot;<br/>
                                          -Michael Wilbon</div>