You're right!
See
http://www.verfassungen.de/de/de33-45/oesterreich38-5.htm (art.1,
point 5)
Peter
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Anton Zeilinger"
<anton_zeilinger@h...> wrote:
> No, Jungholz was actually absorbed into the surrounding Reichsgau
> (Garmisch-Partenkirchen, I think, but I would have to look it up),
and
> it was not part of the Tyrol anymore, thus not an exclave. But its
> communal boundaries probably remained unchanged, so it did still
> "exist" on a certain level, and Sorgschrofen was a communal
quadripoint...
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "L. A. Nadybal"
<lnadybal@c...>
> wrote:
> > Good point - it disappeared as an international level enclave,
but was
> > still an exclave of Land Tirol.
> > Len
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Smaardijk"
> > <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "L. A. Nadybal"
<lnadybal@c...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > With the Anschluß of Austria by Germany, Jungholz disappeared
as the
> > > > two countries became one; and then, after WWII, it
reappeared. Now
> > > > don't go splitting hairs about it being "only" a pene-. I
know, I
> > > > know, I know.
> > > >
> > > > LN
> > >
> > > Did Jungholz really disappear? The boundaries around Jungholz
were no
> > > longer international ones - but that goes for all of ATDE. Dit
> > > Jungholz become part of Bavaria then?
> > >
> > > Enclaves are special territories; their boundaries aren't
special.
> > > They're just boundaries.
> > >
> > > Peter