Subject: Re: enclaves on stamps
Date: Sep 23, 2004 @ 08:11
Author: Anton Zeilinger ("Anton Zeilinger" <anton_zeilinger@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> Mike D. wrote:other, and
>
> > forgive me
> > i am not trying to be cloudy
> > & i see lowell thinks he may see & agree with this
> > so i will at least stand by for clearance
> > but this too makes no sense to me
> >
> > if you simply move across the quadripoint position
> > wherever it is actually located
> > you are in fact partly reaching one part of austria before fully
> > leaving the other
> > & it is impossible not to do so
>
> You had to know that this was coming:
>
> What if Jungholz were separated from the rest of Austria by one foot of
> intervening German territory? You could still step from one to the
> you would also be partially entering one before fully leaving theother, just as
> you say above. However, every atom of your being would pass throughGerman
> territory on the way. Guess what: That happens anyway when youstep across the
> Jungholz binational quadrapoint as it exists, because none of youratoms are
> infinitely small--as is the point of intersection. That is why someof us
> contend that the single point is of no practical consequence.boundary with
>
> Put another way, if Germany were to build a wall along its entire
> Austria, that wall would touch corner-to-corner at the Jungholz cross,a foot or a
> separating the two parts of Austria as effectively as if there were
> mile of German territory between them.It just has
>
> To me, that makes Jungholz an enclave, just as surely as any other.
> a peculiarity that most others don't.I fully agree! The point connecting Jungholz with Austria is a
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA